Kuasa presiden PAS tidak mutlak Abang Ahmad Kardee Abang Masagus Lajnah Undang-undang dan Hak Asasi Manusia PAS Pusat ( LUHAM ) bermesyuarat pada 8hb September 2014 bagi membincangkan kenyataan yang dikeluarkan Majlis Syura Ulama ( MSU ) pada 7 September 2014. Setelah berbincang dan meneliti segala peruntukan yang terkandung di dalam Perlembagaan PAS termasuk peruntukan-peruntukan tertentu yang dirujuk MSU di dalam kenyataan rasmi tersebut, LUHAM sebulat suara bersetuju supaya suatu kenyataan rasmi dibuat bagi menyatakan pandangan LUHAM berkenaan isu yang dibangkitkan dalam kenyataan rasmi MSU tersebut. LUHAM berpendapat bahawa walaupun Fasal 8 (1) (a) Perlembagaan PAS memberi kuasa kepada MSU untuk menghurai, menjelaskan dan menafsir mana-mana peruntukan perlembagaan di dalam Perlembagaan PAS sepertimana yang dinyatakan MSU di dalam kenyataan rasmi badan itu, namun terdapat dua (2) prasyarat yang perlu dipenuhi sepertimana yang dinyatakan di Fasal 88 (1) Perlembagaan PAS iaitu perlunya ada perselisihan faham dan adanya rujukan secara rasmi kepada MSU terlebih dahulu. Kemudiannya, jika dilihat kepada Fasal 8 (1) (a) tersebut, peruntukan itu juga menyebut bahawa kuasa menghurai, menjelas dan menafsirkan mana-mana peruntukan Perlembagaan PAS itu hanya timbul jika timbulnya kesamaran mengenai maksud dan tujuan mana-mana peruntukan perlembagaan tersebut. Dengan tidak menafikan kewujudan kuasa MSU bagi menghurai, menjelas dan menafsir mana mana peruntukan Perlembagaan PAS jika timbulnya kesamaran, LUHAM juga berpendapat menjadi satu keperluan juga bagi MSU benar-benar mengetahui dan memahami kaedah-kaedah penafsiran sesuatu perlembagan supaya apa-apa tafsiran yang diberikan adalah lebih tepat, munasabah dan memenuhi ruh, matan dan niat perlembagaan itu sendiri. LUHAM berpendapat tidak salah bagi MSU sepatutnya merujuk kepada LUHAM bagi membantu MSU dalam melaksanakan kuasa yang diberi kepadanya untuk menghurai, menjelas dan menafsir peruntukan dalam Perlembagaan PAS kerana LUHAM adalah lajnah yang telah diamanahkan parti di dalam apa-apa urusan perundangan dan berdasarkan amalan yang berlaku di dalam PAS, segala persoalan undang-undang yang melibatkan parti termasuk dalam memahami peruntukan undang-undang termasuk Perlembagaan parti rujukan lazimnya diajukan kepada LUHAM terlebih dahulu. Bagi tujuan kenyataan rasmi ini, LUHAM akan menyentuh tentang dua (2) perkara iaitu isu:- A) Kuasa MSU berdasarkan Perlembagaan PAS; dan B) Kuasa Presiden PAS yang dikatakan MSU sebagai pihak yang mempunyai kuasa pemutus di bawah Fasal 26 (1) (a) Perlembagaan PAS. Isu pertama 1. Mengenai isu pertama iaitu berkaitan isu bidangkuasa dan kuasa MSU : LUHAM ingin menyatakan bahawa jika dilihat kepada Perlembagaan PAS, kewujudan MSU adalah terhad bagi melaksanakan hasrat berikut iaitu bagi menjamin kekuasaan PAS yang diperuntukan dalam Fasal 7 (2) dan badan-badan yang diberikan kuasa Muktamar PAS tidak keluar dari kehendak-kehendak yang diperuntukan dalam Fasal 7 (1) Perlembagaan PAS dan juga tidak berlawanan dengan dasar PAS (Lihat Fasal 8 (1) Perlembagaan PAS). Adapun kuasa-kuasa MSU diperuntukan di dalam Fasal 8 (1) (a) hingga (c) Perlembagaan PAS. 2. Menjadi pengetahuan umum bahawa MSU (di atas sebab yang hanya diketahui oleh badan itu) turut sama terlibat dalam isu pemilihan calon MB Selangor. Ini boleh dilihat dalam beberapa kenyataan rasmi yang dibuat MSU berhubung perkara tersebut. Persoalan yang timbul adalah, adakah Perlembagaan PAS memberi kuasa kepada MSU untuk berbuat demikian? 3. LUHAM berpendapat MSU, dengan penuh hormat, bertindak melampaui kuasanya apabila badan itu membuat keputusan dalam isu yang melibatkan pelantikan MB Selangor. Alasan LUHAM adalah seperti berikut. 4. Isu pelantikan MB Selangor tidak melibatkan perkara yang bertentangan dengan kehendak-kehendak Fasal 7 (1) Perlembagaan PAS dan juga tidak berlawanan dengan dasar PAS. Satu fakta yang tidak dipertikaikan adalah PAS bersetuju mengadakan tahaluf atau kerjasama dengan Pakatan Rakyat dan kerjasama tersebut disahkan Muktamar PAS dan sehingga kini tidak pernah dibatalkan. Menurut Fasal 7 (1) Perlembagaan PAS, kekuasaan PAS adalah dipegang Muktamar PAS. Memandangkan Muktamar PAS, sebagai kuasa tertinggi dalam PAS, memutuskan bahawa PAS bertahaluf dengan PR maka tidak dapat tidak, di dalam apa sahaja tindakan dan keputusannya, maka MSU mahupun PAS mesti bertindak selari dengan ketetapan Mukamar PAS tersebut. 5. Isu pokok yang berbangkit dalam isu MB Selangor ini adalah presiden membuat ketetapan untuk menghantar nama daripada PAS sebagai calon MB (yang kemudiannya disokong MSU). Sedangkan, presiden sendiri sebelum ini menyatakan bahawa PAS tidak akan menuntut jawatan MB Selangor memandangkan ia adalah milik PKR. LUHAM percaya ini adalah berdasarkan kepada ketetapan Muktamar yang memutuskan bahawa PAS bertahaluf dengan PR. Justeru, apabila nama Adun PAS turut dicalonkan sebagai MB Selangor, tidakkan ia menyalahi perjanjian PAS di dalam PR itu sendiri? Tidakkah perlanggaran ini menjurus kepada pelanggaran keputusan Muktamar itu sendiri? Justeru, LUHAM berpendapat tidak wujud sebarang perselisihan faham dalam hal keputusan Muktamar ini yang perlu kepada tafsiran MSU. 6. Isu pelantikan MB Selangor juga tidak melibatkan keperluan untuk MSU menghurai, menjelas dan menafsirkan mana-mana peruntukan Perlembagaan PAS. Maka LUHAM tidak nampak apakah keperluan atau justifikasi untuk MSU terlibat dalam perkara yang tidak termasuk dalam bidangkuasa badan tersebut sebagaimana yang digariskan dalam Perlembagaan PAS. 7. Hatta, jika MSU berpendapat isu pelantikan MB Selangor ini melibatkan perselisihan faham dan pendapat tentang tafsiran Perlembagaan PAS berdasarkan Fasal 88 (1) Perlembagaan PAS, badan itu hanya boleh bertindak sekiranya ada rujukan dibuat kepada badan itu. 8. Di dalam bahasa perundangan, kuasa MSU adalah kuasa atas rujukan (“referral”) dan bukan kuasa "of first instance" atau kuasa yang sedia ada (inherent). Dengan ketiadaan perselisihan faham dan pendapat tentang tafsiran Perlembagaan PAS berhubung isu pelantikan MB Selangor dan dengan ketiadaan rujukan dibuat ahli jawatankuasa PAS Pusat kepada MSU bagi MSU menafsir Perlembagaan PAS, maka, tindakan MSU mencampuri isu pelantikan MB Selangor itu, dengan hormat, adalah “non-starter". 9. Apa yang jelas isu mengenai pelantikan MB Selangor adalah melibatkan isu penyusunan, pengaturan dan perlaksanaan strategi politik yang jelas di bawah bidangkuasa ahli jawatankuasa PAS Pusat sepertimana yang diperuntukkan di bawah Fasal 26 (9) (a) Perlembagaan PAS. 10. LUHAM kembali merujuk kepada dua (2) prasyarat di dalam Fasal 88 (1) Perlembagaan PAS yang tidak pun dipenuhi sebelum MSU mengeluarkan penafsiran tersebut. Ini adalah kerana kuasa presiden adalah jelas dinyatakan secara bertulis di dalam Fasal 26 Perlembagaan PAS. Sehubungan itu, jika MSU ingin menambah kuasa presiden yang tidak dinyatakan secara bertulis di dalam perlembagaan, maka perlulah dibuat pindaan perlembagaan bagi tujuan tersebut di dalam Muktamar. Isu kedua 11. Isu ini melibatkan kuasa presiden dalam kerangka Perlembagaan PAS. LUHAM merasa terpanggil untuk membuat kenyataan rasmi berkenaan isu kedua ini kerana LUHAM berpendapat MSU, dengan penuh hormat, membuat kenyataan yang tidak tepat mengenai kuasa presiden dalam kenyataan rasmi MSU yang dibuat pada 7 September 2014. 12. Dalam kenyataan rasminya itu, MSU menyatakan bahawa presiden PAS mempunyai kuasa pemutus dalam apa jua perkara yang melibatkan kepentingan parti berdasarkan Fasal 26 (1) Perlembagaan PAS. Dalam konteks isu pemilihan MB Selangor, kenyataan MSU itu boleh difahami bahawa kuasa presiden sebagai kuasa pemutus termasuk kuasa beliau membuat keputusan memutuskan siapakah calon MB Selangor yang beliau rasakan wajar diangkat kepada D.Y.M.M Sultan Selangor dan keputusan beliau itu adalah mewakili keputusan PAS dan tidak boleh dipertikaikan mana-mana pihak dalam PAS. Dengan perkataan lain kuasa pemutus presiden yang ditafsir MSU adalah termasuk kuasa membuat apa-apa keputusan tanpa bermesyuarat atau berunding dengan anggota-angota permesyuaratan dalam Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat. 13. Dalam konteks fakta kes yang melatari kenyataan MSU itu, MSU berpendapat meskipun selepas mesyuarat pada 17 dan 25 Ogos 2014, Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat bermesyuarat dan membuat keputusan berhubung isu pelantikan MB Selangor, sebarang keputusan presiden secara bersendiri tanpa merujuk dan tanpa mesyuarat dengan Ahli Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat selepas kedua-dua tarikh tersebut termasuk membuat keputusan yang sama sekali berbeza dari segi matan dan ruh keputusan pada kedua-dua tarikh tersebut adalah sah dan mesti dipatuhi. 14. Lanjutan dari kuasa pemutus residen yang ditafsir MSU tersebut, maka MSU juga menyatakan bahawa adalah menjadi kewajipan bagi ahli-ahli Jawatankuasa PAS Pusat menjalankan arahan dan tugas dari presiden tersebut sebagaimana yang diperuntukkan di dalam Fasal 26 (9) (m) Perlembagaan PAS. 15. Dengan penuh hormat, LUHAM berpendapat, tafsiran yang diberikan MSU berkenaan kuasa presiden tersebut dibuat atas premis yang salah maka kenyataan yang keluar dari premis yang salah itu amat amat sukar untuk dipertahankan. 16. Kenyataan MSU berhubung kuasa pemutus presiden tersebut dibuat atas premis jawatan presiden dalam Perlembagaan PAS adalah satu jawatan yang berdiri secara sendiri dan terpisah dengan Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat. Kenyataan MSU malangnya bertentangan sama sekali dengan peruntukan-peruntukan yang terdapat dalam Perlembagaan PAS dan juga bertentangan dengan ruh, matan dan niat Perlembagaan PAS itu sendiri. 17. LUHAM berpendapat tidak wujud apa-apa peruntukan dalam Perlembagaan PAS mengenai jawatan presiden secara bersendiri. Sebaliknya jawatan presiden PAS adalah termasuk dalam Fasal 26 Perlembagaan PAS iaitu dibawah kepala "Tugas-Tugas Ahli Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat". 18. Jika dilihat kepada Fasal 26 tersebut, adalah jelas bahawa jawatan presiden diletakkan di bawah satu bumbung Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat di mana presiden adalah salah satu anggota Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat tersebut di samping timbalan presiden, naib-naib presiden, setiausahan agung, bendahari, ketua penerangan, pengarah pilihanraya dan ahli-ahli jawatankuasa kerja yang dipilih dalam Muktamar PAS dan dilantik berdasarkan Perlembagaan PAS. 19. Fasal 25 (1) Perlembagaan PAS secara jelas menyatakan keanggotaan Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat di mana salah seorang anggota Jawatankuasa Kerja tersebut adalah presiden PAS. 20. Berdasarkan Fasal 25 dan 26 Perlembagaan PAS tersebut, adalah jelas niat penggubal Perlembagaan PAS adalah tidak memisahkan jawatan presiden dari Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat dan bertolak dari hal tersebut, idea bahawa presiden mempunyai kuasa pemutus dalam apa jua perkara dengan mengenepikan anggota-anggota permesyuaratan Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat adalah suatu yang amat asing dalam PAS dan secara jelas tidak mengikuti peruntukan jelas, ruh dan niat Perlembagaan PAS . 21. Memandangkan jawatan presiden termasuk dalam Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat, Perlembagaan PAS mempromosi prinsip konsultasi dan permesyuaratan dalam Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat maka apa sahaja peruntukan yang menggariskan kuasa dan peranan presiden dalam Perlembagaan PAS harus dibaca atas prinsip yang dinyatakan tersebut. 22. Apatah lagi, Fasal 27 (5) Perlembagaan PAS sendiri mengesahkan bahawa Dewan Harian (di mana presiden sendiri adalah termasuk di dalam Dewan Harian) hanya melaksanakan tugas-tugas yang diperturunkan kuasanya Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat. Justeru, mana mungkin ahli-ahli Dewan Harian melangkaui tugas-tugas yang diperturunkan Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat kepadanya. 23. LUHAM juga berpendapat apa sahaja peruntukan mengenai kuasa dan peranan presiden harus dibaca secara harmoni dengan peruntukan lain dalam Perlembagaan PAS bagi mencapai hasrat dan prinsip yang digariskan tersebut. 24. Sehubungan itu LUHAM berpendapat bahwa MSU, dengan penuh hormat, tersilap menyatakan bahawa kuasa Presiden di bawah Fasal 26 (1) (a) Perlembagaan PAS adalah satu kuasa pemutus yang secara tersiratnya satu kuasa yang bersifat mutlak atau “veto”. Dengan lain perkataan, jika kita menerima tafsiran MSU tersebut, presiden mempunyai kuasa membuat apa-apa keputusan di luar mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat sekaligus menjadikan peranan Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat tidak lagi relevan. 25. Hakikat bahawa presiden sewajarnya mengamalkan prinsip permesyuaratan dan konsultasi dengan anggota-angota lain dalam Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat boleh dilihat dalam beberapa peruntukan lain dalam Perlembagaan PAS Pusat. 26. Sebagai contoh di dalam Fasal 26 (1) (c), meskipun ia termasuk dalam peruntukan mengenai kuasa presiden, fasal tersebut menyatakan bahawa persetujuan mesyuarat Kerja PAS Pusat perlu diperolehi dalam pelantikan jawatan-jawatan tertentu dalam PAS. 27. Jika dilihat kepada tugas-tugas yang diamanahkan kepada timbalan presiden PAS dan naib-naib presiden PAS sepertimana yang diperuntukkan masing-masing di bawah Fasal 26 (2) (a) dan (3) (a) Perlembagaan PAS adalah bagi membantu tugas-tugas presiden. Bagaimanakah timbalan presiden dan naib-naib presiden boleh menjalankan peranan mereka bagi membantu presiden bagi membuat atau mencapai satu keputusan jika mereka tidak dilibatkan dalam mesyuarat bagi membuat satu-satu keputusan bagi kepentingan parti? 28. Begitu juga jika dilihat kepada Fasal 27 iaitu peruntukan mengenai tugas-tugas Jawatankuasa Harian PAS Pusat, yang mana presiden salah seorang anggota Jawatankuasa Harian tersebut, adalah jelas di bawah Fasal 27 (6) Perlembagaan PAS, diperuntukan "semua keputusan dan tindakan yang dibuat jawatankuasa ini mengikut ceraian (1) , (2), (3) dan (4) fasal ini hendaklah dimaklumkan dan disahkan Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat.” 29. LUHAM berpendapat, berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip yang dinyatakan di atas dan juga peruntukan yang dinukilkan di atas, adalah jelas bahawa jawatan presiden tidak mempunyai kuasa pemutus di luar mesyuarat atau tanpa bermesyuarat dengan Ahli Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat terlebih dahulu mengenai apa sahaja perkara sehingga ke tahap presiden tidak perlu mengendahkan atau memanggil atau mengadakan mesyuarat terlebih dahulu dengan anggota-anggota lain di dalam Jawankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat. 30. Berdasarkan kepada Fasal 27 (6) Perlembagaan PAS yang dinyatakan di atas, adalah jelas dinyatakan bahawa keputusan Dewan Harian yang merangkumi presiden, timbalan presiden, naib-naib presiden, setiausaha agung dan sebagainya perlu membawa keputusan mereka kepada Jawatankuasa kerja PAS Pusat untuk kelulusan. Justeru, adalah aneh sekali apabila presiden secara tiba-tiba boleh bertindak seorang diri melangkaui kuasa Dewan Harian mahupun kuasa Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat yang menurunkan kuasa kepadanya. Lebih-lebih lagi, keputusan mengenai mencalonkan calon MB di kalangan Adun PAS juga dibuat tanpa memaklumkan perkara itu terlebih dahulu kepada ahli-ahli Dewan Harian yang lain. 31. LUHAM berpendapat sebarang tafsiran yang membenarkan presiden bertindak hingga ke tahap yang dinyatakan tersebut adalah bercanggah dengan ruh, matan dan niat Perlembagaan PAS. 32. LUHAM juga berpendapat jawatan presiden dalam PAS adalah berkonsep "Constitutional Presidency" (Presiden Berperlembagaan) iaitu kuasa dan peranannya dihadkan Perlembagaan maka sebarang tafsiran yang keluar dari konsep atau doktrin tersebut adalah tafsiran yang amat asing dan tidak boleh dipertahankan ("unsustainable"). 33. Sayugia dinyatakan di sini, dalam menafsirkan perlembagaan khususnya yang menyentuh isu kuasa dan bagaimana kuasa itu dilaksanakan nasihat dari Lord Acton yang dinukilkan Almarhum Raja Azlan Shah dalam kes Sri Lempah Enterprise v Pentadbir Tanah Wilayah Persekutuan amat relevan untuk diperhati "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely". 34. LUHAM juga ingin merujuk kepada petikan Kertas Pindaan Perlembagaan PAS pada tahun 1983 di mana pindaan dibuat untuk tidak memusatkan kuasa kepada presiden (secara bersendirian atau tanpa bermesyuarat dan mencapai persetujuan dengan Ahli Jawatankuasa Kerja PAS Pusat terlebih dahulu). Pindaan dibuat untuk mengubahsuai beberapa perkara yang berkaitan dengan tugas presiden untuk mewujudkan tanggungjawab bersama dan berasaskan syura dalam mengendalikan urusan parti dan menghapuskan pemusatan kuasa kepada individu yang boleh menghalang segala langkah dan tindakan yang boleh diambil melalui syura. 35. Penjelasan yang diberikan LUHAM ini dibuat demi kebaikan parti dalam jangka masa yang panjang. LUHAM khuatir kita akan membuat duluan (precedent) yang tidak baik kepada generasi selepas ini yang memungkinkan mereka mengikut duluan ini tanpa usul periksa yang akhirnya membuatkan parti huru-hara dan hilang integritinya sebagai parti yang berprinsip dan Jemaah yang berdisiplin. 36. LUHAM sama sekali tidak merendahkan ketinggian MSU dalam PAS. Namun sebagai lajnah yang diamanahkan dalam isu-isu perundangan, maka adalah menjadi tanggungjawab LUHAM untuk memberi pandangan atau menegur sesuatu yang dilihat melanggar peruntukan perlembagaan yang kita semua sepakati bersama, walaupun teguran ini agak pahit untuk ditelan. 37. Kenyataan rasmi ini adalah mewakili LUHAM di mana ahli lajnahnya secara kolektif bertanggungjawab sepenuhnya ke atas segala keputusan, pandangan dan komentar seperti yang dinyatakan di sini. – 9 September, 2014 * Penulis ialah Setiausaha Lajnah Undang-Undang PAS - See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/rencana/article/kuasa-presiden-pas-tidak-mutlak-abang-ahmad-kardee-abang-masagus#sthash.csAj9O9N.dpuf

The Amazing Quran

The Amazing Quran

Calling the Qur’an amazing is not something done only by Muslims, who have an appreciation for the book and who are pleased with it; it has been labeled amazing by non-Muslims as well. In fact, even people who hate Islam very much have still called it amazing.

One thing which surprises non-muslims who are examining the book very closely is that the Qur’an does not appear to them to be what they expected. What they assume is that they have an old book which came fourteen centuries ago from the Arabian desert; and they expect that the book should look something like that an old book from the desert. And then they find out that it does not resemble what they expected at all. Additionally, one of the first things that some people assume is that because it is an old book which comes from the desert, it should talk about the desert. Well the Qur’an does talk about the desert - some of its imagery describes the desert; but it also talks about the sea - what it’s like to be in a storm on the sea.



Some years ago, the story came to us in Toronto about a man who was in the merchant marine and made his living on the sea. A Muslim gave him a translation of the Qur’an to read. The merchant marine knew nothing about the history of Islam but was interested in reading the Qur’an. When he finished reading it, he brought it back to the Muslim and asked, “This Muhammed was he a sailor?” He was impressed at how accurately the Qur’an describes a storm on a sea. When he was told, “No as a matter of fact, Muhammed lived in the desert,” that was enough for him. He embraced Islam on the spot. He was so impressed with the Qur’an’s description because he had been in a storm on the sea, and he knew that whoever had written that description had also been in a storm on the sea. The description of “a wave, over it a wave, over it clouds” was not what someone imagining a storm on a sea to be like would have written; rather, it was written by someone who knew what a storm on the sea was like. This is one example of how the Qur’an is not tied to a certain place and time. Certainly, the scientific ideas expressed in it also do not seem to originate from the desert fourteen centuries ago.


Many centuries before the onset of Muhammed’s Prophethood, there was a well- known theory of atomism advanced by the Greek philosopher, Democritus. He and the people who came after him assumed that matter consists of tiny, indestructible, indivisible particles called atoms. The Arabs too, used to deal in the same concept; in fact, the Arabic word dharrah commonly referred to the smallest particle known to man. Now, modern science has discovered that this smallest unit of matter (i.e., the atom, which has all of the same properties as its element) can be split into its component parts. This is a new idea, a development of the last century; yet, interestingly enough, this information had already been documented in the Qur’an which states:


He [i.e., Allah] is aware of an atom’s weight in the heavens and on the earth and even anything smaller than that...”



Undoubtedly, fourteen centuries ago that statement would have looked unusual, even to an Arab. For him, the dharrah was the smallest thing there was. Indeed, this is proof, that the Qur’an is not outdated.



Another example of what one might expect to find in an”old book” that touches upon the subject of health or medicine is outdated remedies or cures. Various historical sources state that the Prophet gave some advice about health and hygiene, yet most of these pieces of advice are not contained in the Qur’an. At first glance, to the non-Muslims this appears to be a negligent omission. They cannot understand why Allah would not “include” such helpful information in the Qur’an. Some Muslims attempt to explain this absence with the following argument: “Although the Prophet’s advice was sound and applicable to the time in which he lived, Allah, in His infinite wisdom, knew that there would come later medical and scientific advances which would make the Prophet’s advice appear outdated. When later discoveries occurred, people might say that such information contradicted that which the Prophet had given. Thus, since Allah would never allow any opportunity for the non-Muslims to claim that the Qur’an contradicts itself or the teachings of the Prophet, He only included in the Qur’an information and examples which could stand the test of time.”



However, when one examines the true realities of the Qur’an in terms of its existence as a divine revelation, the entire matter is quickly brought into its proper perspective, and the error in such argumentation becomes clear and understandable. It must be understood that the Qur’an is a divine revelation, and as such, all information in it is of divine origin. Allah revealed the Qur’an from Himself. It is the words of Allah, which existed before creation, and thus nothing can be added, subtracted or altered. In essence, the Qur’an existed and was complete before the creation of Prophet Muhammed, so it could not possibly contain any of the Prophet’s own words or advice. An inclusion of such information would clearly contradict the purpose for which the Qur’an exists, compromise its authority and render it inauthentic as a divine revelation.


Consequently, there was no “home remedies” in the Qur’an which one could claim to be outdated; nor does it contain any man’s view about what is beneficial to health, what food is best to eat, or what will cure this or that disease. In fact, the Qur’an only mentions one item dealing with medical treatment, and it is not in dispute by anyone. It states that in honey there is healing. And certainly, I do not think that there is anyone who will argue with that!



If one assumes that the Qur’an is the product of a man’s mind, then one would expect it to reflect some of what was going on in the mind of the man who “composed” it. In fact, certain encyclopedias and various books claim that the Qur’an was the product of hallucinations that Muhammed underwent. If these claims are true - if it indeed originated from some psychological problems in Muhammed’s mind - then evidence of this would be apparent in the Qur’an. Is there such evidence? In order to determine whether or not there is, one must first identify what things would have been going on in his mind at that time and then search for these thoughts and reflections in the Qur’an.



It is common knowledge that Muhammad had a very difficult life. All of his daughters died before him except one, and he had a wife of several years who was dear and important to him, who not only proceeded him in death at a very critical period of his life. As a matter of fact, she must have been quite a woman because when the first revelation came to him, he ran home to her afraid. Certainly, even today one would have a hard time trying to find an Arab who would tell you, “I was so afraid that I ran home to my wife.” They just aren’t that way. Yet Muhammed felt comfortable enough with his wife to be able to do that. That’s how influential and strong woman she was. Although these examples are only a few of the subjects that would have been on Muhammed’s mind, they are sufficient in intensity to prove my point. The Qur’an does not mention any of these things - not the death of his children, not the death of his beloved companion and wife, not his fear of the initial revelations, which he so beautifully shared with his wife - nothing; yet, these topics must have hurt him, bothered him, and caused him pain and grief during periods of his psychological reflections, then these subjects, as well as others, would be prevalent or at least mentioned throughout.



A truly scientific approach to the Qur’an is possible because the Qur’an offers something that is not offered by other religious scriptures, in particular, and other religions, in general. It is what scientists demand. Today there are many people who have ideas and theories about how the universe works. These people are all over the place, but the scientific community does not even bother to listen to them. This is because within the last century the scientific community has demanded a test of falsification. They say, “If you have theory, do not bother us with it unless you bring with that theory a way for us to prove whether you are wrong or not.”



Such a test was exactly why the scientific community listened to Einstein towards the beginning of the century. He came with a new theory and said, “I believe the universe works like this; and here are three ways to prove whether I am wrong!”. So the scientific community subjected his theory to the tests, and within six years it passed all three. Of course, this does not prove that he was great, but it proves that he deserved to be listened to because he said, “This is my idea; and if you want to try to prove me wrong, do this or try that.” This is exactly what the Qur’an has - falsification tests. Some are old (in that they have already been proven true), and some still exist today. Basically it states, “If this book is not what it claims to be, then all you have to do is this or this or this to prove that it is false.” Of course, in 1400 years no one has been able to do “This or this or this, “and thus it is still considered true and authentic. I suggest to you that the next time you get into dispute with someone about Islam and he claims that he has the truth and that you are in darkness, you leave all other arguments at first and make this suggestion. Ask him, “Is there any falsification test in your religion? Is there anything in your religion that would prove you are wrong if I could prove to you that it exists - anything?” Well, I can promise right now that people will not have anything - no test, no proof, nothing! This is because they do not carry around the idea that they should not only present what they believe but should also offer others a chance to prove they’re wrong. However, Islam does that. A perfect example of how Islam provides man with a chance to verify it authenticity and “prove it wrong” occurs in the 4th chapter. And quiet honestly, I was surprised when I first discovered this challenge. It states:



“Do they not consider the Qur’an? Had it been from any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy.”



This is a clear challenge to the non-Muslim. Basically, it invites him to find a mistake. As a matter of fact, the seriousness and difficulty of the challenge aside, the actual presentation of such a challenge in the first place is not even in human nature and is inconsistent with man’s personality. One doesn’t take an exam in school after finishing the exam; write a note to the instructor at the end saying, “This exam is perfect. There are no mistakes in it. Find one if you can!”. One just doesn’t do that. The teacher would not sleep until he found a mistake! And yet this is the way the Qur’an approaches people. Another interesting attitude that exists in the Qur’an repeatedly deals with its advice to the reader. The Qur’an informs that reader about different facts and then gives the advice: “If you want to know more about this or that, or if you doubt what is said, then you should ask those who have knowledge.” This too is a surprising attitude. It is not usual to have a book that comes from someone without training in geography, botany, biology, etc., who discusses these subjects and then advises the reader to ask men of knowledge if he doubts anything.



Yet in every age there have been Muslims who have followed the advice of the Qur’an and made surprising discoveries. If one looks to the works of Muslim scientists of many centuries ago, one will find them full of quotations from the Qur’an. These works state that they did research in such a place, looking for something. And they affirm that the reason they looked in such and such a place was that the Qur’an pointed them in that direction. For example, the Qur’an mentions man’s origin and then tells the reader, “Research it!” It gives the reader a hint where to look and then states that one should find out more about it. This is the kind of thing that Muslims today largely seem to overlook - but not always, as illustrated in the following example. A few years ago, a group of men in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia collected all if the verses in the Qur’an which discuss embryology - the growth of the human being in the womb. They said, “Here is what the Qur’an says. Is it the truth?” In essence, they took the advice of the Qur’an: “Ask the men who know.” They chose, as it happened, a non-Muslim who is a professor of embryology at the University of Toronto. His name is Keith Moore, and he is the author of textbooks on embryology - a world expert on the subject. They invited him to Riyadh and said, “This is what the Qur’an says about your subject. Is it true? What can you tell us?” While he was in Riyadh, they gave him all of the help that he needed in translation and all of the cooperation for which he asked. And he was so surprised at what he found that he changed his textbooks. In fact, in the second edition of one of his books, called Before we are born.., in the second edition about the history of embryology, he included some material that was not in the first edition because of what he found in the Qur’an. Truly this illustrates that the Qur’an was ahead of its time and that those who believe in the Qur’an know what other people do not know.



I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Keith Moore for a television presentation, and we talked a great deal about this - it was illustrated by slides and so on. He mentioned that some of the things that the Qur’an states about the growth of the human being were not known until thirty years ago. In fact, he said that one item in particular - the Qur’an’s description of the human being as a “leech-like clot” (‘alaqah) at one stage - was new to him; but when he checked on it, he found that it was true, and so he added it to his book. He said, “I never thought of that before,” and he went to the zoology department and asked for a picture of a leech. When he found that it looked just like the human embryo, he decided to include both pictures in one of his textbooks. Dr. Moore also wrote a book on clinical embryology, and when he presented this information in Toronto, it caused quite a stir throughout Canada. It was on the front pages of some of the newspapers across Canada, and some of the headlines were quite funny. For instance, one headline read:



“SURPRISING THING FOUND IN ANCIENT BOOK!”!

It seems obvious from this example that people do not clearly understand what it is all about. As a matter of fact, one newspaper reporter asked Professor Moore, “Don’t you think that maybe the Arabs might have known about these things - the description of the embryo, its appearance and how it changes and grows? Maybe there were not scientists, but maybe they did something crude dissections on their own - carved up people and examined these things.”



The professor immediately pointed out to him that he [i.e., the reporter] had missed a very important point - all of the slides of the embryo that had been shown and had been projected in the film had come from pictures taken through a microscope. He said, “It does not matter if someone had tried to discover embryology fourteen centuries ago, they could not have seen it!”. All of the descriptions in the Qur’an of the appearance of the embryo are of the item when it is still too small to see with the eye; therefore, one needs a microscope to see it. Since such a device had only been around for little more than two hundred years, Dr. Moore taunted, “Maybe fourteen centuries ago someone secretly had a microscope and did this research, making no mistakes anywhere. Then he somehow taught Muhammad and convinced him to put this information in his book. Then he destroyed his equipment and kept it a secret forever. Do you believe that? You really should not unless you bring some proof because it is such a ridiculous theory.” In fact, when he was asked “How do you explain this information in the Qur’an?” Dr. Moore’s reply was, “It could only have been divinely revealed.”!



Although the aforementioned example of man researching information contained in the Qur’an deals with a non-Muslim, it is still valid because he is one of those who is knowledgeable in the subject being researched. Had some layman claimed that what the Qur’an says about embryology is true, then one would not necessarily have to accept his word. However, because of the high position, respect, and esteem man gives scholars, one naturally assumes that if they research a subject and arrive at a conclusion based on that research, then the conclusion is valid. One of Professor Moore’s colleagues, Marshall Johnson, deals extensively with geology at the University of Toronto.



He became very interested in the fact that the Qur’an’s statements about embryology are accurate, and so he asked Muslims to collect everything contained in the Qur’an which deals with his specialty. Again people were very surprised at the findings. Since there are a vast number subjects discussed in the Qur’an, it would certainly require a large amount of time to exhaust each subject. It suffices for the purpose of this discussion to state that the Qur’an makes very clear and concise statements about various subjects while simultaneously advising the reader to verify the authenticity of these statements with research by scholars in those subjects. And as illustrated by the Qur’an has clearly emerged authentic. Undoubtedly, there is an attitude in the Qur’an which is not found anywhere else. It is interesting how when the Qur’an provides information, it often tells the reader, “You did not know this before.” Indeed, there is no scripture that exists which makes that claim. All of the other ancient writings and scriptures that people have, do give a lot of information, but they always state where the information came from.



For example, when the Bible discusses ancient history, it states that this king lived here, this one fought in a certain battle, another one had so may sons, etc. Yet it always stipulates that if you want more information, then you should read the book of so and so because that is where the information came from. In contrast to this concept, the Qur’an provides the reader with information and states that this information is something new. Of course, there always exists the advice to research the information provided and verify its authenticity. It is interesting that such a concept was never challenged by non-Muslims fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, the Makkans who hated the Muslims, and time and time again they heard such revelations claiming to bring new information; yet, they never spoke up and said, “This is not new. We know where Muhammad got this information. We learned this at school.”



They could never challenge its authenticity because it really was new! In concurrence with the advice given in the Qur’an to research information (even if it is new), when ‘Umar was caliph, he chose a group of men and sent them to find the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn. Before the Qur’anic revelation, the Arabs had never heard of such a wall, but because the Qur’an described it, they were able to discover it. As a matter of fact, it is now located in what is called Durbend in the Soviet Union. It must be stressed here that the Qur’an is accurate about many, many things, but accuracy does not necessarily mean that a book is a divine revelation. In fact, accuracy is only one of the criteria for divine revelations.



For instance, the telephone book is accurate, but that does not mean that it is divinely revealed. The real problem lies in that one must establish some proof of the source the Qur’an’s information. The emphasis is on the reader. One cannot simply deny the Qur’an’s authenticity without sufficient proof. If, indeed, one finds a mistake, then he has the right to disqualify it. This is exactly what the Qur’an encourages. Once a man came up to me after a lecture I delivered in South Africa. He was very angry about what I had said, and so he claimed, “I am going to go home tonight and find a mistake in the Qur’an.” Of course, I said, “Congratulations. That is the most intelligent thing that you have said.” Certainly, this is the approach Muslims need to take with those who doubt the Qur’an’s authenticity, because the Qur’an itself offers the same challenge. An inevitably, after accepting it’s challenge and discovering that it is true, these people will come to believe it because they could not disqualify it. In essence, the Qur’an earns their respect because they themselves have had to verify its authenticity. An essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough concerning the authenticity of the Qur’an is that one’s inability to explain a phenomenon himself does not require his acceptance of the phenomenon’s existence or another person’s explanation of it.



Specifically, just because one cannot explain something does not mean that one has to accept someone else’s explanation. However, the person’s refusal of other explanations reverts the burden of proof back on himself to find a feasible answer. This general theory applies to numerous concepts in life, but fits most wonderfully with the Qur’anic challenge, for it creates a difficulty for one who says, “I do not believe it.” At the onset of refusal one immediately has an obligation to find an explanation himself if he feels others’ answers are inadequate. In fact, in one particular Qur’anic verse which I have always seen mistranslated into English, Allah mentions a man who heard the truth explained to him. It states that he was derelict in his duty because after he heard the information, he left without checking the verity of what he had heard. In other words, one is guilty if he hears something and does not research it and check to see whether it is true. One is supposed to process all information and decide what is garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile information to be kept and benefited from at a later date. One cannot just let it rattle around in his head. It must be put in the proper categories and approached from that point of view. For example, if the information is still speculatory, then one must discern whether it’s closer to being true or false. But if all of the facts have been presented, then one must decide absolutely between these two options. And even if one is not positive about the authenticity of the information, he is still required to process all of the information and make the admission that he just does not know for sure. Although this last point appears to be futile, in actuality, it is beneficial to the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later time in that it forces the person to at least recognize, research and review the facts. This familiarity with the information will give the person “the edge” when future discoveries are made and additional information is presented. The important thing is that one deals with the facts and does not simply discard them out of empathy and disinterest.



The real certainty about the truthfulness of the Qur’an is evident in the confidence which is prevalent throughout it; and this confidence comes from a different approach - “Exhausting the Alternatives.” In essence, the Qur’an states, “This book is a divine revelation; if you do not believe that, then what is it?” In other words, the reader is challenged to come up with some other explanation. Here is a book made of paper and ink. Where did it come from? It says it is a divine revelation; if it is not, then what is its source? The interesting fact is that no one has with an explanation that works. In fact, all alternatives have bee exhausted. As has been well established by non-Muslims, these alternatives basically are reduces to two mutually exclusive schools of thought, insisting on one or the other. On one hand, there exists a large group of people who have researched the Qur’an for hundreds of years and who claim, “One thing we know for sure - that man, Muhammad, thought he was a prophet. He was crazy!” They are convinced that Muhammad (SAW) was fooled somehow. Then on the other hand, there is another group which alleges, “Because of this evidence, one thing we know for sure is that that man, Muhammad, was a liar!” Ironically, these two groups never seem to get together without contradicting. In fact, many references on Islam usually claim both theories. They start out by saying that Muhammad (SAW) was crazy and then end by saying that he was a liar. They never seem to realize that he could not have been both!



For example, if one is deluded and really thinks that he is a prophet, then he does not sit up late at night planning, “How will I fool the people tomorrow so that they think I am a prophet?” He truly believes that he is a prophet, and he trusts that the answer will be given to him by revelation. As a matter of fact, a great deal of the Qur’an came in answer to questions. Someone would ask Muhammad (SAW) a question, and the revelation would come with the answer to it. Certainly, if one is crazy and believes that an angel put words in his ear, then when someone asks him a question, he thinks that the angel will give him the answer. Because he is crazy, he really thinks that. He does not tell someone to wait a short while and then run to his friends and ask them, “Does anyone know the answer?” This type of behavior is characteristic of one who does not believe that he is a prophet. What the non-Muslims refuse to accept is that you cannot have it both ways. One can be deluded, or he can be a liar. He can be either one or neither, but he certainly cannot be both! The emphasis is on the fact that they are unquestionably mutually exclusive personal traits.



The following scenario is a good example of the kind of circle that non-Muslims go around in constantly. If you ask one of them, “What is the origin of the Qur’an?” He tells you that it originated from the mind of a man who was crazy. Then you ask him, “If it came from his head, then where did he get the information contained in it? Certainly the Qur’an mentions many things with which the Arabs were not familiar.” So in order to explain the fact which you bring him, he changes his position and says, “Well, maybe he was not crazy. Maybe some foreigner brought him the information. So he lied and told people that he was a prophet.” At this point then you have to ask him, “If Muhammad was a liar, then where did he get his confidence? Why did he behave as though he really thought he was a prophet?” Finally backed into a corner, like a cat he quickly lashes out with the first response that comes to his mind. Forgetting that he has already exhausted that possibility, he claims, “Well, maybe he wasn’t a liar. He was probably crazy and really thought that he was a prophet.” And thus he begins the futile circle again.



As has already been mentioned, there is much information contained in the Qur’an whose source cannot be attributed to anyone other than Allah. For example, who told Muhammad about the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn - a place hundreds of miles to the north? Who told him about embryology? When people assemble facts such as these, if they are not willing to attribute their existence to a divine source, they automatically resort to the assumption someone brought Muhammad the information and that he used it to fool the people. However, this theory can easily be disproved with one simple question: “If Muhammad was a liar, where did he get his confidence? Why did he tell some people out right to their face what others could never say?” Such confidence depends completely upon being convinced that one has a true divine revelation. For example, the Prophet (SAW) had an uncle by the name of Abu Lahab. This man hated Islam to such an extent that he used to follow the Prophet around in order to discredit him. If Abu Lahab saw the Prophet (SAW) speaking to a stranger, he would wait until they parted and then would go to the stranger and ask him, “What did he tell you? Did he say, ‘Black.’? Well, it’s white. Did he say, ‘Morning.’? Well, it’s night.” He faithfully said the exact opposite of whatever he heard Muhammad (SAW) and the Muslims say. However, about ten years before Abu Lahab died, a little chapter in the Qur’an was revealed to him. It distinctly stated that he would go to the Fire (i.e., Hell). In other words, it affirmed that he would never become a Muslim and would therefore be condemned forever. For ten years all Abu Lahab had to do was say, “I heard that it has been revealed to Muhammad that I will never change - that I will never become a Muslim and will enter the Hellfire. Well I want to become a Muslim now. How do you like that? What do you think of your divine revelation now?” But he never did that. And yet, that is exactly the kind of behavior one would have expected from him since he always sought to contradict Islam. In essence, Muhammad (SAW) said, “You hate me and you want to finish me? Here, say these words, and I am finished. Come on, say them!” But Abu Lahab never said them. Ten years! And in all that time he never accepted Islam or even became sympathetic to the Islamic cause. How could Muhammad possibly have known for sure that Abu Lahab would fulfill the Qur’anic revelation if he (i.e., Muhammad)was nottrulythe messengerofAllah? Howcould he possibly have been so confident as to give someone 10 years to discredit his claim of Prophethood? The only answer is that he was Allah’s messenger; for in order to put forth suck a risky challenge, one has to be entirely convinced that he has a divine revelation.



Another example of the confidence which Muhammad (SAW) had in his own Prophethood and consequently in the divine protection of himself and his message is when he left Makkah and hid in a cave with Abu Bakr during their emigration to Madeenah. The two clearly saw people coming to kill them, and Abu Bakr was afraid. Certainly, if Muhammad (SAW) was a liar, a forger and one who was trying to fool the people into believing that he was a prophet, one would have expected him to say in such a circumstance to his friend, “Hey, Abu Bakr, see if you can find a back way out of this cave.” Or “Squat down in that corner over there and keep quiet.” Yet, in fact, what he said to Abu Bakr clearly illustrated his confidence. He told him, “Relax! Allah is with us, and Allah will save us!”



Now, if one knows that he is fooling the people, where does one get this kind of attitude? In fact, such a frame of mind is not characteristic of a liar or a forger at all. So, as has been previously mentioned, the non-Muslims go around and around in a circle, searching for a way out - some way to explain the findings in the Qur’an without attributing them to their proper source. On one hand, they tell you on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, “The man was a liar,” and on the other hand, on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday they tell you, “He was crazy.” What they refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they need both excuses to explain the information in the Qur’an.



About seven years ago, I had a minister over to my home. In the particular room which we were sitting there was a Qur’an on the table, face down, and so the minister was not aware of which book it was. In the midst of a discussion, I pointed to the Qur’an and said, “I have confidence in that book.” Looking at the Qur’an but not knowing which book it was , he replied, “Well, I tell you, if that book is not the Bible, it was written by a man!” In response to his statement, I said, “Let me tell you something about what is in that book.” And in just three to four minutes I related to him a few things contained in the Qur’an. After just those three or four minutes, he completely changed his position and declared, “You are right. A man did not write that book. The Devil wrote it!” Indeed, possessing such an attitude is very unfortunate - for many reasons. For one thing, it is a very quick and cheap excuse. It is an instant exit out of an uncomfortable situation. As a matter of fact, there is a famous story in the Bible that mentions how one day some of the Jews were witnesses when Jesus raised a man from the dead. The man had been dead for four days, and when Jesus arrived, he simply said, “Get up!” and the man arose and walked away. At such a sight, some of the Jews who were watching said disbelievingly, “This is the Devil. The Devil helped him!” Now this story is rehearsed often in churches all over the world, and people cry big tears over it, saying, “Oh, if I had been there, I would not have been as stupid as the Jews!” Yet ironically, these people do exactly what the Jews did when in just three minutes you show them only a small part of the Qur’an and all they can say is, “Oh, the Devil did it. The devil wrote that book!”. Because they are truly backed into a corner and have no other viable answer, they resort to the quickest and cheapest excuse available. Another Example of people’s use of this weak stance can be found in the Makkans’ explanation of the source of Muhammed’s message. They used to say, “The devils bring Muhammad that Qur’an!” But just as with every other suggestion made, the Qur’an gives the answer. One verse in particular states:



“And they say, ‘Surely he is possessed [byjinn], ‘but it [i.e., the Qur’an] is not except a reminder to the worlds.”



Thus it gives an argument in reply to such a theory. In fact, there are many arguments in the Qur’an in reply to the suggestion that devils brought Muhammad (SAW) his message. For example, in the 26th chapter Allah clearly affirms:



“No evil ones have brought it [i.e., this revelation] down. It would neither be fitting for them, nor would they be able. Indeed they have been removed far from hearing.”



And in another place in the Qur’an, Allah instructs us:



“So when you recite the Qur’an seek refuge in Allah from Shaytaan, the rejected”

Now is this how Satan writes a book? He tells one, “Before you read my book, ask God to save you from me.”?

This is very, very tricky. Indeed, a man could write something like this, but would Satan do this? Many people clearly illustrate that they cannot come to one conclusion on this subject. On one hand, they claim that Satan would not do such a thing and that even if he could, God would not allow him to; yet, on the other hand, they also believe that Satan is only that much less than God. In essence they allege that the Devil can probably do whatever God can do. And as a result, when they look at the Qur’an, even as surprised as they are as to how amazing it is, they still insist, “The Devil did this!” Thanks be to Allah, Muslims do not have that attitude. Although Satan may have some abilities, they are a long way separated from the abilities of Allah. And no Muslim is a Muslim unless he believes that. It is common knowledge even among non-Muslims that the Devil can easily make mistakes, and it would be expected that he would contradict himself if and when he wrote a book. For indeed, the Qur’an states:



“Do they not consider the Qur’an? Had it been from any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy.”



In conjunction with the excuses that non-Muslims advance in futile attempts to justify unexplainable verses in the Qur’an, there is another attack often rendered which seems to be a combination of the theories that Muhammad (SAW) was crazy and a liar. Basically, these people propose that Muhammad was insane, and as a result of his delusion, he lied to and misled people. There is a name for this in psychology. It is referred to as mythomania. It means simply that one tells lies and then believes them. This is what the non-Muslims say Muhammad (SAW) suffered from. But the only problem with this proposal is that one suffering from mythomania absolutely cannot deal with facts, and yet the whole Qur’an is based entirely upon facts. Everything contained in it can be researched and established as true. Since facts are such a problem for a mythomaniac, when a psychologist tries to treat one suffering from that condition, he continually confronts him with facts. For example, if one is mentally ill and claims, “I am the king of England,” a psychologist does not say to him “No you aren’t. You are crazy!” He just does not do that.

Rather, he confronts him with facts and says, “O.K., you say you are the king of England. So tell me where the queen is today. And where is your prime minister? And where are your guards?” Now, when the man has trouble trying to deal with these questions, he tries to make excuses, saying Uh... the queen... she has gone to her mother’s. Uh... the prime minister... well he died.” And eventually he is cured because he cannot deal with the facts. If the psychologist continues confronting him with enough facts, finally he faces the reality and says, “I guess I am not the king of England.” The Qur’an approaches everyone who reads it in very much the same way a psychologist treats his mythomania patient. There is a verse in the Qur’an which states:



“Oh mankind, there has come to you an admonition [i.e., the Qur’an] from your Lord and a healing for what is in the hearts - and guidance and mercy for the believers.”



At first glance, this statement appears vague, but the meaning of this verse is clear when one views it in light of the aforementioned example. Basically, one is healed of his delusions by reading the Qur’an. In essence, it is therapy. It literally cures deluded people by confronting them with facts. A prevalent attitude throughout the Qur’an is one which says,

“Oh mankind, you say such and such about this; but what about such and such? How can you say this when you know that?”

And so forth. It forces one to consider what is relevant and what matters while simultaneously healing one of the delusions that the facts presented to mankind by Allah can easily be explained away with flimsy theories and excuses. It is this very sort of thing - confronting people with facts - that had captured the attention of many non-Muslims. In fact, there exists a very interesting reference concerning this subject in the New Catholic Encyclopedia.



In an article under the subject of the Qur’an, the Catholic Church states, “Over the centuries, many theories have been offered as to the origin of the Qur’an... Today no sensible man accepts any of these theories.”!! Now here is the age-old Catholic Church, which has been around for so many centuries, denying these futile attempts to explain away the Qur’an. Indeed, the Qur’an is a problem for the Catholic Church. It states that it is revelation, so they study it. Certainly, they would love to find proof that it is not, but they cannot. They cannot find a viable explanation. But at least they are honest in their research and do not accept the first unsubstantiated interpretation which comes along.

The Church states that in fourteen centuries it has not yet been presented a sensible explanation. At least it admits that the Qur’an is not an easy subject to dismiss. Certainly, other people are much less honest. They quickly say, “Oh, the Qur’an came from here. The Qur’an came from there.” And they do not even examine the credibility of what they are stating most of the time. Of course, such a statement by the Catholic Church leaves the everyday Christian in some difficulty. It just may be that he has his own ideas as to the origin of the Qur’an, but as a single member of the Church, he cannot really act upon his own theory. Such an action would be contrary to the obedience, allegiance and loyalty which the Church demands. By virtue of his membership, he must accept what the Catholic Church declares without question and establish its teachings as part of his everyday routine. So, in essence, if the Catholic Church as a whole is saying, “Do not listen to these unconfirmed reports about the Qur’an,” then what can be said about the Islamic point of view? Even non-Muslims are admitting that there is something to the Qur’an - something that has to be acknowledged - then why are people so stubborn and defensive and hostile when Muslims advance the very same theory? This is certainly something for those with mind a to contemplate - something to ponder for those of understanding!



Recently, the leading intellectual in the Catholic Church - a man by the name of Hans - studied the Qur’an and gave his opinion of what he had read. This man has been around for some time, and he is highly respected in the Catholic Church and after careful scrutiny, he reported his findings, concluding, “God has spoken to man through the man, Muhammad.” Again this is a conclusion arrived at by a non-Muslim source - the very leading intellectual of the Catholic Church himself! I do not think that the Pope agrees with him, but nonetheless, the opinion of such a noted, repute public figure must carry some weight in defense of the Muslim position. He must be applauded for facing the reality that the Qur’an is not something which can be easily pushed aside and that, in fact God is the source of these words. As is evident from the aforementioned information, all of the possibilities have been exhausted, so the chance of finding another possibility of dismissing the Qur’an is nonexistent. For if the book is not a revelation, then it is a deception; and if it is a deception, one must ask, “What is its origin” And where does it deceive us?” Indeed, the true answers to these questions shed light on the Qur’an’s authenticity and silence the bitter unsubstantiated claims of the unbelievers. Certainly, if people are going to insist that the Qur’an is a deception, then they must bring forth evidence to support such a claim. The burden of proof is on them, not us! One is never supposed to advance a theory without sufficient corroborating facts; so I say to them, “Show me one deception! Show me where the Qur’an deceives me! Show me, otherwise, don’t say that it is a deception!” An interesting characteristic of the Qur’an is how it deals with surprising phenomena which relate not only to the past but to modern times as well. In essence, the Qur’an is not and old problem. It is still a problem even today - a problem to the non-Muslims that is. For everyday, every week, every year brings more and more evidence that the Qur’an is a force to be contended with - that its authenticity is no longer to be challenged! For example, one verse in the Qur’an reads;



“Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together, then We clove them asunder, and made from water every living thing? Will they not then believe?”



Ironically, this very information is exactly what they awarded the 1973 Noble Prize for - to a couple of unbelievers. The Qur’an reveals the origin of the universe - how it began from one piece - and mankind continues to verify this revelation, even up to now. Additionally, the fact that all life originated from water would not have been an easy thing to convince people of fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, if 1400 years ago you had stood in the desert and told someone, “All of this, you see (pointing to yourself), is made up of mostly water,” no one would have believed you. Proof of that was not available until the invention of the microscope. They had to wait to find out that cytoplasm, the basic substance of the cell, is made-up of 80% water.

Nonetheless, the evidence did come, and once again the Qur’an stood the test of time. In reference to the falsification tests mentioned earlier, it is interesting to note that they, too, relate to both the past and the present. Some of them were used as illustrations of Allah’s omnipotence and knowledge, while others continue to stand as challenges to the present day. An example of the former is the statement made in the Qur’an about Abu Lahab. It clearly illustrates that Allah, the Knower of the Unseen, knew that Abu Lahab would never change his ways and accept Islam. Thus Allah dictated that he would be condemned to the Hellfire forever. Such a chapter was both an illustration of Allah’s divine wisdom and a warning to those who were like Abu Lahab.



An interesting example of the latter type of falsification tests contained in the Qur’an is the verse which mentions the relationship between the Muslims and the Jews. The verse is careful not to narrow its scope to the relationship between individual members of each religion, but rather, it summarizes the relationship between the two groups of people as a whole. In essence, the Qur’an states that the Christians will always treat the Muslims better than the Jews will treat the Muslims. Indeed, the full impact of such a statement can only be felt after careful consideration of the real meaning of such a verse. It is true that many Christians and many Jews have become Muslims, but as a whole, the Jewish community is to be viewed as an avid enemy of Islam. Additionally, very few people realize what such an open declaration in the Qur’an invites. In essence, it is an easy chance for the Jews to prove that the Qur’an is false - that it is not a divine revelation. All they have to do is organize themselves, treat the Muslims nicely for a few years and then say, “Now what does your holy book say about who are your best friends in the world - the Jews or the Christians? Look what we Jews have done for you!” That is all they have to do to disprove the Qur’an’s authenticity, yet they have not done it in 1400 years. But, as always, the offer still stands open!



All of the examples so far given concerning the I various angles from which one can approach the Qur’an have undoubtedly been subjective in nature; I however there does exist another angle, among others, which is objective and whose basis is mathematical. It is surprising how authentic the Qur’an becomes when one assembles what might be referred to as a list of good guesses. Mathematically, it can be explained using guessing and prediction examples. For instance, if a person has two choices (i.e., one is right, and one is wrong), and he closes his eyes and makes a choice, then half of the time (i.e., one time out of two) he will be right. Basically, he has a one in two chance, for he could pick the wrong choice, or he could pick the right choice. Now if the same person has two situations like that (i.e., he could be right or wrong about situation number one, and he could be right or wrong about situation number two), and he closes his eyes and guesses, then he will only be right one fourth of the time (i.e., one time out of four). He now has a one in four chance because now there are three ways for him to be wrong and only one way for him to be right. In simple terms, he could make the wrong choice in situation number one and then make the wrong choice in situation number two; OR he could make the wrong choice in situation number one and then make the right choice in situation number two; OR he could make the right choice in situation number one and then make the wrong choice in situation number two; OR he could make the right choice in situation number one and then make the right choice in situation number two. Of course, the(only instance in which he could be totally right is the last scenario where he could guess correctly in both situations. The odds of his guessing completely correctly have become greater because the number of situations for him to guess in have increased; and the mathematical equation representing such a scenario is 1/2 x 1/2 (i.e., one time out of two for the first situation multiplied by one time out of two for the second situation).



Continuing on with the example, if the same person now has three situations in which to make blind guesses, then he will only be right one eighth of the time (i.e., one time out of eight or 1/2 X 1/2 X 1/2). Again, the odds of choosing the correct choice in all three situations have decreased his chances of being completely correct to only one time in eight. It must be understood that as the number of situations increase, the chances of being right decrease, for the two phenomena are inversely proportional.
Now applying this example to the situations in the Qur’an, if one draws up a list of all of the subjects about which the Qur’an has made correct statements, it becomes very clear that it is highly unlikely that they were all just correct blind guesses.

Indeed, the subjects discussed in the Qur’an are numerous, and thus the odds of someone just making lucky guesses about all of them become practically nil. If there are a million ways for the Qur’an to be wrong, yet each time it is right, then it is unlikely that someone was guessing. The following three examples of subjects about which the Qur’an has made correct statements collectively illustrate how the Qur’an continues to beat the odds.



In the 16th chapter the Qur’an mentions that the female bee leaves its home to gather food.12 Now, a person might guess on that, saying, “The bee that you see flying around - it could be male, or it could be female. I think I will guess female.” Certainly, he has a one in two chance of being right. So it happens that the Qur’an is right. But it also happens that was not what most people believed at the time when the Qur’an was revealed. Can you tell the difference between a male and a female bee? Well, it takes a specialist to do that, but it has been discovered that the male bee never leaves his home to gather food. However, in Shakespeare’s play, Henry the Fourth, some of the characters discuss bees and mention that the bees are soldiers and have a king. That is what people thought in Shakespeare’s time - that the bees that one sees flying around are male bees and that they go home and answer to a king. However, that is not true at all. The fact is that they are females, and they answer to a queen. Yet it took modern scientific investigations in the last 300 years to discover that this is the case.



So, back to the list of good guesses, concerning the topic of bees, the Qur’an had a 50/50 chance of being right, and the odds were one in two.
In addition to the subject of bees, the Qur’an also discusses the sun and the manner in which it travels through space. Again, a person can guess on that subject. When the sun moves through space, there are two options: it can travel just as a stone would travel if one threw it, or it can move of its own accord. The Qur’an states the latter - that it moves as a result of its own motion.’3 To do such, the Qur’an uses a form of the word sabaha to describe the sun’s movement through space. In order to properly provide the reader with a comprehensive understanding of the implications of this Arabic verb, the following example is given. If a man is in water and the verb sabaha is applied in reference to his movement, it can be understood that he is swimming, moving of his own accord and not as a result of a direct force applied to him. Thus when this verb is used in reference to the sun’s movement through space, it in no way implies that the sun is flying uncontrollably through space as a result of being hurled or the like. It simply means that the sun is turning and rotating as it travels. Now, this is what the Qur’an affirms, but was it an easy thing to discover? Can any common man tell that the sun is turning? Only in modern times was the equipment made available to project the image of the sun onto a tabletop so that one could look at it without being blinded. And through this process it was discovered that not only are there three spots on the sun but that these spots move once every 25 days. This movement is referred to as the rotation of the sun around its axis and conclusively proves that, as the Qur’an stated 1400 years ago, the sun does, indeed turn as it travels through space.



And returning once again to the subject of good guess, the odds of guessing correctly about both subjects - the sex of bees and the movement of the sun - are one in four!
Seeing as back fourteen centuries ago people probably did not understand much about time zones, the Quran’s statements about this subject are considerably surprising. The concept that one family is having breakfast as the sun comes up while another family is enjoying the brisk night air is truly something to be marveled at, even in modern time. Indeed, fourteen centuries ago, a man could not travel more than thirty miles in one day, and thus it took him literally months to travel from India to Morocco, for example. And probably , when he was having supper in Morocco, he thought to himself, “Back home in India they are having supper right now.” This is because he did not realize that, in the process of traveling, he moved across a time zone. Yet, because it is the words of Allah, the All-Knowing, the Qur’an recognizes and acknowledges such a phenomenon. In an interesting verse it states that when history comes to an end and the Day of Judgment arrives, it will all occurring an instant; and this very instant will catch some people in the daytime and some people at night. This clearly illustrates Allah’s divine wisdom and His previous knowledge of the existence of time zones, even though such a discovery was non-existent back fourteen centuries ago. Certainly, this phenomenon is not something which is obvious to one’s eyes or a result of one’s experience, and this fact, in itself, suffices as proof of the Qur’ans authenticity.



Returning one final time to the subject of good guesses for the purpose of the present example, the odds that someone guessed correctly about all three of the aforementioned subjects - the sex of bees, the movement of the sun and the existence of time zones - are one in eight!



Certainly, one could continue on and on with this example, drawing up longer and longer list of good guesses; and of course, the odds would become higher and higher with each increase of subjects about which one could guess. But what no one can deny is the following; the odds that Mohammed an illiterate, guessed correctly about thousands and thousands of subjects, never once making a mistake, are so high that any theory of his authorship of the Qur’an must be completely dismissed - even by the most hostile enemies of Islam!



Indeed, the Qur’an expects this kind of challenge. Undoubtedly, if one said to someone upon entering a foreign land, “I know your father. I have met him,” probably the man from that land would doubt the newcomer’s word, saying, “You have just come here. How could you know my father?” As a result, he would question him, “Tell me, is my father tall, short, dark, fair? What is he like?” Of course, if the visitor continued answering all of the questions correctly, the skeptic would have no choice but to say, “I guess you do know my father. I don’t know how you know him, but I guess you do!” The situation is the same with the Qur’an. It states that it originates from the One who created everything. So everyone has the right to say, “Convince me! If the author of this book really originated life and everything in the heavens and on the earth, then He should know about this, about that, and so on.” And inevitably, after researching the Qur’an, everyone will discover the same truths. Additionally, we all know something for sure: we do not all have to be experts to verify what the Qur’an affirms. One’s iman (faith) grows as one continues to check and confirm the truths contained in the Qur’an. And one is supposed to do so all of his life.



May God (Allah) guide everyone close to the truth.



SUPPLEMENT



An engineer at the University of Toronto who was interested in psychology and who had read something on it, conducted researched wrote a thesis on Efficiency of Group Discussions. The purpose of his research was to find out how much people accomplish when they get together to talk in groups of two, three, ten, etc. The graph of his findings: people accomplish most when they talk in groups of two. Of course, this discovery was entirely beyond his expectations, but it is very old advice given in the Qur’an:



Additionally, the 89th chapter of the Qur’an mentions a certain city by the name of ‘Iram (a city of pillars), which was not known in ancient history and which was non-existent as far as historians were concerned. However, the December 1978 edition of National Geographic introduced interesting information which mentioned that in 1973, the city of Elba was excavated in Syria. The city was discovered to be 43 centuries old, but that is not the most amazing part. Researchers found in the library of Elba a record of all of the cities with which Elba had done business. Believe or not, there on the list was the name of the city of ‘Iram. The people of Elba had done business with the people of ‘Iram!



“Say, ‘I exhort you to one thing - that you stand for Allah, [assessing the truth] by twos and singly, and then reflect ‘

In conclusion I ask you to consider with care the following:



“And they say, ‘Why are not signs sent down to him from his Lord?’ Say, ‘Indeed, the signs are with Allah, and I am but a clear warner.’ But is sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the Book [i.e. Qur’an] which is rehearsed to them? Verily, in that is mercy and a reminder to people who believe.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zATtBLSOpec





The Amazing
Quran

by

Gary Miller







This booklet was first published by Muhammed Asadi (transcribed from the video tape of Mr Miller’s lecture) He compiled and published the booklet on September 18, 1990 in Lahore, Pakistan. His current email address is SilenceOO4@aol.com

Listen to this lecture at youtube

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zATtBLSOpec

The Hidden Tyranny

INTRODUCTION


This booklet contains the text of a most revealing and shocking interview of a Jew by the name of Harold Rosenthal, which was conducted in 1976, by a concerned patriot, a Walter White, Jr.. Mr. Rosenthal, an influential Jew, learned in the Jewish ways and involved in the workings of government in Washington, D.C., explained the Jewish involvement and cause of the major problems we face today.
The Anti-defamation League of B'nai B'rith, a Zionist organization, claims the tapes are a forgery and offer as evidence that "White failed to explain why he would wait to first publish the booklet until 1978, [two] years after he had "spoken" with Rosenthal, who was killed by terrorists in 1976." As usual, the Zionists must reach beyond logic to attempt to dismiss revealing information about Talmudic Zionism
Rosenthal, in exposing certain aspects of the 'inner invisible world of Jewry', revealed the modes and tactics Jews have used in destroying Christian civilization and covertly attaining control over our lives and governments. The result has been a 'hidden tyranny' upon us like the tyranny waged against the Saints by the red beast system of Revelation referred to as 'Mystery Babylon'.
But how could such a small number of Jews enslave so many people and gain such an overwhelming control over their governments, especially without their being aware of it? The answer to this may be found in Christ's parable of the unjust steward, which represents Jewry. They are able to prevail in the world despite their ungodly ways because of their cunning and shrewd ways. As Christ said "For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light." (Luke 16:8)


In other words, the Jew, with his worldly mind set, is wiser than God's Christian people. When you read the words of Mr. Rosenthal the reality of this statement will come to light. This problem was so prevalent and important for us to overcome that Christ had instructed us to "be wise as serpents". (Matthew 10:16)
America and the world is now covered in political, economic, moral and social problems which need to be acted upon by Christian people. As Edmund Burke stated: "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." But before we can properly act we need a proper (not just a superficial) understanding of the problem. This booklet will help provide the reader with that understanding.
--Charles A. Weisman June, 1992
________________________________________









The Hidden Tyranny
Part One

In a highly confidential interview with a Jewish administrative assistant to one of this nation's ranking senators, Jacob Javits R-NY, he said, "It is a marvel that the American people do not rise up and drive every Jew out of this country." Mr. Harold Wallace Rosenthal, made this statement after admitting Jewish dominance in all significant national programs. He said, "We Jews continue to be amazed with the ease by which Christian Americans have fallen into our hands. While the naive Americans wait for Khrushchev to bury them, we have taught them to submit to our every demand." Asked how a nation could be captured without their knowing it, Mr. Rosenthal attributed this victory to absolute control of the media. He boasted of Jewish control of ALL NEWS. Any newspaper which refused to acquiesce to controlled news was brought to its knees by withdrawing advertising. Failing in this, the Jews stop the supply of news print and ink. "It's a very simple matter," he stated. Asked about men in high political office, Mr Rosenthal said that no one in the last three decades has achieved any political power without Jewish approval. "Americans have not had a presidential choice since 1932. Roosevelt was our man; every president since Roosevelt has been our man." In a discussion about George Wallace, Mr. Rosenthal smiled and suggested that we note where Wallace stands today.
When the U.S. foreign policy was mentioned, the bedroom confidence of the interview was all but set aside. With disdain and mockery he sneered at the American stupidity in failing to see through the entire scope of Kissinger's foreign policy. "It is Zionist-Communist policy from beginning to end. Yet the citizens think this Jewish policy will benefit America." He cited "detente" and Angola as examples of Jewish diplomacy. The credulous nature of Americans drew only contempt from him.
The interview continued on an almost omniscient plane.
"We Jews have put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns. With their eye's fixed on the issues, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We Jews toy with the American public as a cat toys with a mouse."
As the conversation went on into the late hours, one could sense that perhaps America deserves the reign of terror being planned for her. The Jewish mind pits every ethnic group against the other. "The blood of the masses will flow as we wait for our day of world victory," Mr. Rosenthal said coldly.
For hours after this incredible discussion, a sense of inadequacy prevailed. Is it possible that another group of "human being" could be so treacherous in spirit, so evil in intent? Yet, the words heard and the evidence at hand are real. Is it possible that the American people can remain docile, even while their life's blood is being drained from them? It seems so.
WHAT DOES ALL THIS SAY TO US? Since what you have just read plus the lengthy inerview that followed, Mr. Harold Wallace Rosenthal, age 29, the administrative assistant to Senator Jacob K. Javits of New York was killed in an alleged sky-jacking attempt on an Israeli airliner in Istanbul, Turkey, August 12, 1976.
It would appear that Mr. Rosenthal might have "talked too freely" because although four people were killed and some 30 injured during the sky-jacking attempt, Rosenthal was not killed by a random bullet as were the others. From reports secured at the time, it seems amazing and strange that of all the people involved in this incident Mr. Rosenthal should have been fatally wounded. Meanwhile, I Walter White who conducted this confidential interview, can now state after much investigation, expense and travel, that Harold Rosenthal was undoubtedly murdered at the Istanbul Airport, in what was to appear as a hijacking probably by his own people
We had no desire to hurt anyone and especially members of the Rosenthal family who had suffered enough in this tragedy. We corresponded with his mother and father in Philadelphia and his brother Mark David Rosenthal who is attending college in Northern California. In fact, it was he who advised me that Harold's friends in Washington had set up a memorial fund in Harold W. Rosenthal's name. He sent us a copy of "The Harold W. Rosenthal Fellowship in International Relations" American Jewish committee, Washington Chapter, 818-18th street N.W. Washington,D.C. 20006. It lists some of the "who's who" and the honorary Co-Chairmen are Vice President Walter F. Mondale and Senator Jacob K. Javits. Out of respect, we decided to wait until a year had passed since the death of Harold Wallace Rosenthal so we delayed publishing everything he gave us on the memorable day and evening. And as stated before, the interview was lengthy as he seemed to enjoy pouring out this information and at times it was broken and went on into the evening. This writer and editor is not easily shocked but as this egotist Harold W. Rosenthal raved on and on I found so much of what he said actually horrifying the actual betrayal of which he admittedly was a part and he appeared to gloat over the apparent success of a Jewish World Conspiracy. This, mind you, comes from an "administrative assistant" to one of our ranking Senator's, Jacob K. Javits of New York.
What you are about to read should act as a WARNING to all non-Jews throughout the world. It hopefully should open the eyes of many who knew him in Washington government circles. It becomes indeed obvious that what he discloses is not fiction. It is not imagination! He was not pretending as he spoke with knowledge and intelligence. Many things have been said and written about the One World Jewish Conspiracy but never has it been described so openly. It staggers the imagination. Their plans are shocking and many will be astonished at the contents of this document. NOTHING like it has ever been told before. We prefer not to elaborate. You be the judge. Looking back to the time of this interview and having had time to analyze Harold Rosenthal's candidness, we are compelled to think of him as a conceited, boastful yet very knowledgeable person. I would classify him as an egotist and a egoist. At times his cruelty surfaced with a venom, especially as he describes the STUPID CHRISTIANS or "goys" as he so often referred to "us."
This surprised me because the word "goy" is not in our language and he must have known this. His mind was thoroughly immersed in the ONE-WORLD PLAN of World Jewry. With arrogance, he boasted that the Jew's conquest of the world was almost complete thanks to Christian stupidity. When asked if he was a Zionist, Mr.. Rosenthal replied: "That's a hell of a question! At the foundation of the issue is the traditional Zionist concept of aliyah, a Hebrew term meaning the 'in gathering' or return of Diaspora L.(dispersed Jews) Jews to the Palestine homeland. Ever since 1948 and the creation of the State of Israel, aliyah has become a basic imperative of Israeli government policy." What is aliyah? Will you please spell it for me? He did so and we inquired as to the realistic meaning of aliyah. Mr.. Rosenthal said: "It is a permanent physical migration to Palestine, not just a visit. "We asked, what is Zionism? I've heard Jews define it as anything from permanent migration to financial spiritual support of Israel from around the world.
Mr. Rosenthal replied: "Our first leader, former Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, said that Zionism without a 'return to Zion' is phony. Not many American Jews migrate permanently to Israel. Some say that all Jews, by definition, are Zionists. Others say that a Jew is not a Zionist unless he's a member who pays dues to an actively Zionist organization. Definitions have been tossed everywhere since the Jewish homeland became a reality."
Millions of tax-exempt American dollars are sent to Israel yearly and we true American do not like this. Mr. Rosenthal replied: "the naive politicians in Washington are gullible. Most of them are not too bright so the powerful Jewish lobbyists influenced this practice years ago and there is no one strong enough to stop it. Some of the money is even returned to the United States and spent on Zionist propaganda efforts, much of it through the B'nai B'rith and the Conference of Jewish Organizations and the World Jewish Congress. The Jewish Agency is a funding arm, a sort of body of B'nai B'rith officials. There is nothing wrong with sending American dollars to Israel tax-free so long as we are smart enough to get away with it.
Let's reverse this conversation for a minute. You made it clear and quite vociferously, that you don't like Jews. Why do you hate us?"
Mr. Rosenthal I do not hate anybody. I said I hate what the Jews are doing to us and especially as it relates to any and everything related to Christianity. I hate their deceit, trickery, cunning and their detestable dishonesty. Does that make me anti-Semitic? If it does then I am anti-Semitic!!
"Anti-Semitism does not signify opposition to Semitism. There is no such thing. It is an expression we Jews use effectively as a smear word used to brand as a bigot, like you guys, anyone who brings criticism against Jews. We use it against hate-mongers."
It was made clear that I despised the Jews corruptive influence on our Christian culture and on our properly Christ-oriented American way of life, to which Mr. Rosenthal said: "During Christ's time, the Jews were seeking a material and earthly kingdom but Christ offered the Jews a spiritual kingdom. This, they couldn't buy, so they rejected Jesus Christ and had him crucified."
What do you mean had him crucified? Doesn't history prove that the Jews crucified Jesus Christ? To which he answered: "Yes, I guess they did. I don't beat around the bush but 2,000 years ago your people would have done the same thing to a man who mistreated them as Christ did the Jews."
You speak of Jesus Christ as merely a man.

"That's all he was--a man who walked on the Earth like any other man and this myth about Christ rising from the dead and returning to Earth to visit with his disciples is a bunch of crap. The Jews who drove the Arabs out of Palestine did so to disprove Christ's mission for a spiritual kingdom. You see, instead of a leader who would make an empire for the Jews, your kind of people gave the Jews a peaceful preacher called Christ who instead of an eye-for-an-eye turns the other cheek. Rubbish! We are building and, in fact, have built an earthly empire without your kind and your disappointing Messiah."

I can see that it is you and your kind who try to get Christ out of Christmas. I feel sorry for you... to which he quickly replied:
"Don't give me that shit. I don't want your pity. I don't need it! Too many Jews do not have the guts to tell you how we live and plan, but I am not intimidated by anyone or anything. I know where I'm going."

We asked why do Jews frequently change their names he said:
"Jews are the most intelligent people in the world so if it benefits them to change their name they do so. That's all there is to it. They mix in your society which is plenty corrupt so while the Jews are benefiting themselves the the dumb goy doesn't realize that these Jews with non-Jew names are Jews.
I know what you are thinking about Jews in government who use non-Jew names. Well don't be concerned because in the foreseeable future there will be no Presidential power in the United States. The invisible government is taking strength in that direction."

To your knowledge, are the Jews in Russia really persecuted or are they given any kind of freedom? To which he said:
"Most Jews throughout the world, I'd say more than 90%, know what is really happening to our people. We have communication unequalled anywhere. It is only the jerks, the ignorant and misinformed and degenerates who can find peace in your society and you bastards hide your sins by donning sheep's clothing. You are the hypocrites not the Jews, as you say and write about.
To answer your question in Russia, there are two distinct governments one visible and the other invisible. The visible is made up of different nationalities, whereas the invisible is composed of ALL JEWS.
The powerful Soviet Secret Police takes its orders from the invisible government. There are about six to seven million Communist in Soviet Russia, 50% are Jews and 50% are gentiles, but the gentiles are not trusted. The Communist Jews are united and trust each other, while the others spy on one another. About every five to six years the secret Jewish Board calls for the purge of the party and many are liquidated.
When asked "why"? he said:
"Because they begin to understand too much about the Jewish secret government. Russian Communists have a Secret Group Order which consists of Jews only. They rule over everything pertaining to the visible government. It was this powerful organization that was responsible for the secret removal of the center of Communism to Tel Aviv from where all instructions now originate."

Does our government and the United Nations have knowledge of this? He replied:
"The United Nations is nothing but a trap-door to the Red World's immense concentration camp. We pretty much control the U.N."
When asked why the Communist destroy the middle class or educated and their entire families when they invade a country Mr. Rosenthal replied:

"It is an established rule to destroy all members of pre-existing government, their families and relatives, but never Jews. They destroy all members of the police, state police, army officers and their families but never Jews. You see, we know when a government begins to search for the Communists within its borders they are really attempting to uncover Jews in their area. We're not fooled! The invisible rulers in the Communist countries have a world control over the propaganda and the governments in free countries. We control every media of expression including newspapers, magazines, radio and television. Even your music! We censor the songs released for publication long before they reach the publishers. Before long we will have complete control of your thinking."

The way you boast, if this is true, it is frightening to think about our future, and that of Christianity, to which Mr. Rosenthal said:

"There will be a forced class warfare here in the United States and many will be liquidated. You will unquestionably be among them. The Jews will not be harmed. I'm not boasting! I'm giving you the facts!
And it is too late for your Christian followers to put up a defense. That time is long past. Long, long ago we had to become the aggressors!! That is undoubtedly one of our great purposes in life. We are aggressors!! Because you stole your pretended religious beliefs from our Talmud."

After reminding him that we thought he was intelligent but now realize that he doesn't know what he was talking about he replied:
"Judaism is the unequaled culture -- with nothing, nothing anywhere in the world to compare with it. Your so-called Christianity is an outgrowth of Judaism. The cultural and intellectual influence of Judaism is felt throughout the entire world -- yes, throughout civilization."

When I asked whether he thought we faced a problem eventually with the Blacks because of their startling population increase he said that the Blacks are helping to serve 'our purpose' which might mean several things.
We discussed the Black invasion of city, county and state and their prominence now in television. Also how ridiculous it is for Blacks to become converted to Jews -- like Sammy Davis for instance. Mr. R. replied:
"That doesn't mean anything. We know that a Black cannot become a Jew and that Sammy Davis is still Black. It may have been to his advantage to become converted. In reality he still remains a nigger and not a Jew."

I told him of my in-depth study of the Jews and that there were few who have done more research on world Jewry than I -- and about my unpleasant discoveries -- reminding Mr. R. that there is no morality among Jews. He replied:
"Money is more important than morality. We can accomplish anything with money. Our people are proving that in Israel where its strength against attack is its permanent state of war readiness. Israel can now win in any encounter.
The kibbutz-raised intellectual elements are going to build that small country into a mid-east wonderland. It will also eventually be the base for World Government Headquarters."

We discussed the tragedy of Watergate and corruption at all levels of government and suggested that government representatives practice more openness and candor in dealing with the people. Mr. R. said:
"What good would it do? What the hell does the public know about the running of government. The great majority are asses -- horses asses!!"

May we quote you on that?
"I don't care: what you do -- as I said, few have the guts to speak out. We would all have better understanding between each other -- Jews and gentiles -- if we spoke out more openly. Your people don't have guts. We establish your thinking -- we even place within you a 'guilt complex' making you afraid to criticize Jewry openly."

The Jewish Belief and Religion
In the quietness of this enlightening conversation it became clear that the understanding poured forth did not come from a novice. Mr. Rosenthal was asked how Jews gain acceptance so easily among other races. His answer was long and thorough.

"At a very early date, urged on by the desire to make our way in the world, Jews began to look for a means whereby we might distract all attention from the racial aspect.
What could be more effective, and at the same time more above suspicion, than to borrow and utilize the idea of a religious community? We've been forced to borrow this idea from the Aryans.
We Jews never possessed any religious institution which developed out of our own consciousness, for we lack any kind of idealism. This means that a belief in life beyond this terrestrial existence is foreign to us.
As a matter of fact, the Talmud does not lay down principles with which to prepare the individual for a life to come, but furnishes only rules for a sumptuous life in this world.
It is a collection of instructions for maintaining the Jewish race and regulating: intercourses between us and the goy. Our teachings; are not concerned with moral problems, but rather with how to 'get.'
In regard to the moral value of the Jews' religious teaching, there exist quite exhaustive studies which show the kind of religion that we have in a light that makes it look uncanny to the Aryan mind.
We are the best example of the kind of product which religious training evolves. Our life is of this world only and our mentality is as foreign to the true spirits of Christianity as our character was to the Founder of this new creed 2,000 years ago.
The Founder of Christianity made no secret of his estimation of the Jews and the fact that he was not one of us. When he found it necessary he drove us out of the temple of God, because then, as always, we used religion as a means of advancing our commercial interest.
But at that time, we managed to nail Jesus to the cross for his attitude towards us; whereas, the modern Christians enter into party politics and in order to win elections, they debase themselves by begging for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with us against the interests of their own nation.
We can live among other nations and states only as long as we succeed in persuading them that the Jews are not a distinct people, but are the representatives of a religious faith who, therefore, constitute a 'religious community,' though this be of a peculiar character. As a matter of fact, this is the greatest of our falsehoods.
We are obliged to conceal our own particular character and mode of life so that we will be allowed to continue our existence as a parasite among the nations.
Our success in this line has gone so far that many believe that the Jews among them are genuine Frenchmen, or Englishmen, or Italians, or Germans who just happen to belong to a religious denomination which is different from that prevailing in these countries.
Especially in circles concerned with government, where the officials have only a minimum of historical sense, we are able to impose our infamous deception with comparative ease. Therefore, there is never the slightest suspicion that we Jews form a distinct nation and are not merely the adherents of a 'confession.'
Though one glance at the press which we control ought to furnish sufficient evidence to the contrary, even for those who possess only the smallest degree of intelligence."

The Money Power
When questioned about the ways in which the Jews have gained power, Mr. Rosenthal said:
"Our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system. We authored the quotation. 'Money is power.'
As revealed in our master plan, it was essential for us to establish a private national bank. The Federal Reserve system fitted our plan nicely since it is owned by us, but the name implies that it is a government institution.
From the very outset, our purpose was to confiscate all the gold and silver, replacing them with worthless non-redeemable paper notes. This we have done!"

When asked about the term 'non-redeemable notes,' Mr. Rosenthal replied:
"Prior to 1968, the gullible goy could take a one dollar Federal Reserve note into any bank in America and redeem it for a dollar which was by law a coin containing 412 1/2 grains of 90 per cent silver.
Up until 1933, one could have redeemed the same note for a coin of 25 4/5ths grains of 90 per cent gold. All we do is give the goy more non-redeemable notes, or else copper slugs. But we never give them their gold and silver. Only more paper," he said contemptuously.
"We Jews have prospered through the paper gimmick. It's our method through which we take money and give only paper in return."
Can you give me a example of this? we asked.
"The examples are numerous, but a few readily apparent are the stocks and bonds market, all forms of insurance and the fractional reserve system practiced by the Federal Reserve corporation, not to mention the billions in gold and silver that we have gained in exchange for paper notes, stupidly called money.
Money power was essential in carrying out our master plan of international conquest through propaganda."

When asked how they proposed doing this, he said:
"At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands.
The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies."

Mind Control & Conditioning
When asked if the Jews felt any threat from the 'silent majority,' he laughed at the idea, saying:
"There is no such thing as the silent majority because we control their cry and hue. The only thing that exists is an unthinking majority and unthinking they will remain, as long as their escape from our rigorous service is the opiate of our entertainment industry.
By controlling industry, we have become the task masters and the people the slaves. When the pressure of daily toil builds to an explosive degree, we have provided the safety valve of momentary pleasure.
The television and movie industries furnish the necessary temporary distraction. These programs are carefully designed to appeal to the sensuous emotions, never to the logical thinking mind. Because of this, the people are programmed to respond according to our dictates, not according to reason. Silent they never are; thinking they will remain."

Continuing his thought of Jewish control over the goy, Mr. Rosenthal said:
"We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its manhood exists only in combination with a feminine outward appearance. Being so neutered, the populace has become docile and easily ruled.
As all geldings in nature, their thoughts are not involved with the concerns of the future and their posterity, but only with the present toil and the next meal."

Manipulation of Labor & Industry
It was obvious that the excitement of Mr. Rosenthal was triggered when mention was made of the nation's industry.

"We have been successful in dividing society against itself by pitting labor against management. This perhaps has been one of our greatest feats, since in reality it is a triangle, though only two points ever seem to occur.
In modern industry where exists capital, which force we represent, is the apex. Both management and labor are on the base of this triangle. They continually stand opposed to each other and their attention is never directed to the head of their problem.
Management is forced to raise prices since we are ever increasing the cost of capital. Labor must have increasing wages and management must have higher prices, thus creating a vicious cycle.
We are never called to task for our role which is the real reason for inflation, since the conflict between management and labor is so severe that neither has time to observe our activities. It is our increase in the cost of capital that causes the inflation cycle.
We do not labor or manage, and yet we receive the profits. Through our money manipulation, the capital that we supply industry costs us nothing.
Through our national bank, the Federal Reserve, we extend book credit, which we create from nothing, to all local banks who are member banks. They in turn extend book credit to industry.
Thus, we do more than God, for all of our wealth is created from nothing.
You look shocked! Don't be! It's true, we actually do more than God.
With this supposed capital we bring industry, management and labor into our debt, which debt only increases and is never liquidated. Through this continual increase, we are able to pit management against labor so they will never unite and attack us and usher in a debt-free industrial utopia.
We are the necessary element since we expend nothing. Management can create its own capital -- the profits. Its business would grow and profits increase. Labor would prosper as well, while the price of the product would remain constant, the prosperity of industry, labor and management would continually increase.
We Jews glory in the fact that the stupid goy have never realized that we are the parasites consuming an increasing portion of production while the producers are continually receiving less and less."

The Control Over Religion
As the hours rolled on in this intense, but cordial, interview, Mr. Rosenthal exposed his thoughts concerning religion.

"Religion, too, must be taught, and through this necessity we have labored. With our control of the text book industry and the news media, we have been able to hold ourselves up as the authorities on religion.
Many of our rabbis now hold professorships in supposed Christian theological seminaries. We are amazed by the Christians' stupidity in receiving our teachings and propagating them as their own.
Judaism is not only the teaching of the synagogue, but also the doctrine of every 'Christian Church' in America. Through our propaganda the Church has become our most avid supporter. This has even given us a special place in society, their believing the lie that we are the 'chosen people' and they, gentiles.
These deluded children of the Church defend us to the point of destroying their own culture. ) This truth is evident even to the dullard when one views history and sees that all wars have been white fighting white in order that we maintain our control.
We controlled England during the Revolutionary War, the North during the Civil War, and England and America during World War I and II.
Through our influence of religion we were able to involve the ignorant white Christians in war against themselves which always impoverished both sides while we reaped a financial and political harvest.
Anytime truth comes forth which exposes us, we simply rally our forces -- the ignorant Christians. They attack the crusaders even if they are members of their own families.
Through religion we have gained complete control of society, government and economics. No law is ever passed except its merits have previously been taught from the pulpits.
An example of this is race equality which led to integration and ultimately to mongrelization. The gullible clergy in one breath instruct their parishioners that we are a special, chosen people while in another breath proclaim all races are the same.
Their inconsistency is never discovered. So we Jews enjoy a special place in society while all other races are reduced to racial equality. It is for this reason that we authored the equality hoax, thereby reducing all to a lower level.
We have been taught that our current economic practices are benevolent therefore Christian. These pulpit parrots extol our goodness for loaning them the money to build their temples, never realizing that their own holy book condemns all usury.
They are eager to pay our exorbitant interest rates. They have led society into our control through the same practice. Politically, they hail the blessings of democracy and never understand that through democracy we have gained control of their nation.
Their book again teaches a benevolent despotic form of government in accordance with the laws of that book, while a democracy is mob rule which we control through their Churches, our news media and economic institutions.
Their religion is only another channel through which we can direct the power of our propaganda. These religious puppets' stupidity is only exceeded by their cowardice, for they are ruled easily."

The Light Dawns
Rarely does any man confess the intimacy of his soul as did Mr. Rosenthal. Hindsight suggests that there was a greater Force compelling this man to reveal what has been written here. The remainder of the interview seems to confirm this.
"Since we do not believe in a life after death, all our efforts are directed to the 'now.' We are not as foolish as you and will never adopt an ideology that is rooted in self-sacrifice.
Whereas you will live and die for the benefit of the community, we will live and die only for our own individual self. The idea of self- sacrifice is abhorred by Jews. It is abhorrent to me. No cause is worth dying for since death is the end.
The only time we unite is to preserve our individual selves. As a group of wolves unite to attack a prey, but then disperse after each is filled, so we Jews unite when peril is pending, not to preserve our community but to save our own skin.
This attitude permeates our entire being and philosophy. We are not the creators for to create would only benefit another.
We are the 'acquirers' and are interested only in satisfying the 'self.' To understand our philosophy understand the term 'to get.' We never give but only take. We never labor but enjoy the fruits of others' labor. We do not create but confiscate. We are not the producers but the parasites.
We can physically live within any society, but always remain spiritually apart. To work would be to produce and the highest form of that labor would be to create.
Your race has always worked for the satisfaction of what it produces. We would never work for anyone's benefit, only for what we can get. We have used this Aryan attitude to achieve our greatest prosperity.
You will work for the enjoyment you derive out of producing, while never being concerned about the pay. We take your productivity for a paltry fee and turn it into fortunes.
Until recently, the pride of workmanship exceeded the quest for high incomes. However, we have been able to enslave society to our own power which is money, by causing them to seek after it.
We have converted the people to our philosophy of getting and acquiring so that they will never be satisfied. A dissatisfied people are the pawns in our game of world conquest. Thus, they are always seeking and never able to find satisfaction. The very moment they seek happiness outside themselves, they become our willing servants.
Your people never realize that we offer them only worthless baubles that can not bring fulfillment. They procure one and consume it and are not filled. They procure one and consume it and are not filled. We present another.
We have an infinite number of outward distractions, to the extent that life can not again turn inward to find its definite fulfillment. You have become addicted to our medicine through which we have become your absolute masters.
On the first and fundamental lie, the purpose of which is to make people believe that we are not a nation but a religion, other lies are subsequently based.
Our greatest fear is that this falsehood will be discovered, for we will be stamped out the moment the general public comes into possession of the truth and acts upon it (It is one thing to put a man in possession of the truth, to get him to understand it is another, and to get him to act upon it is another still.
Truth by itself has no value unless used or applied in some way.) It is becoming apparent that an awakening is occurring even here in America.
We had hoped that through our devastation of Christian Germany that any subject dealing with us would be a fearful taboo.
However, there seems to be a resurgence here in the one nation that we so strongly control. We are presently making plans for a rapid exodus. We know that when the light begins to dawn, there will be no stopping it. All efforts on our part will only intensify that light and draw focus upon it.
We fear that light is coming forth in movements across this land, especially yours. It has amazed us how you have been successful in reaching the people after we closed every door of communication.
This, we fear, is a sign of a coming pogrom that will take place in America soon. The American public has realized that we are in control, which is a fatal mistake on our part. This nation could never be the land of the free as long as it is the land of the Jew. This is the revelation that will be our undoing.
The American people have been easily ruled through our propaganda that the pen is mightier than the sword. We virtually get away with murder, and all the goy do is to talk about it, which is ineffective since we, the masters of propaganda, always publish a contradicting account.
If the Aryan would review history and apply those lessons of the past, then the pen will be thrown down in disgust and the sword wielded in the heat of passion. (A recurrence to history would edify our minds and show us that the European countries solved their Jewish problem only by use of force.)
Thus far, we have escaped the sword, when the only reprisal is some periodical of no repute, or some pamphlet with limited circulation. Their pen is no match for ours, but our constant fear is that they may open their eyes and learn that no change was ever brought about with a pen.
History has been written in blood, not with ink. No letter, editorial or book has ever rallied the people or stopped tyranny. We understand this principle and are continually propagandizing the people to write letters to the President, to Congress and to their local media.
We are safe to continually exploit, intimidate and disenfranchise the white American as long as they are preoccupied with the illusion of educating the masses through printed material. Woe be unto us if they ever see the futility of it, lay down the pen and employ the sword.
History confirms the fact that the passions of an aroused minority, no matter how small a group, have exerted enough power to topple the greatest empire. The movements that control destiny are not those that rest on the inactive majority; but on the sheer force of an active minority. Will is power, not numbers, for a strong Will will always rule the masses!
Again, we are safe as long as our Will is stronger, or the Will of the people is misdirected, scattered and without leadership. We will never be deposed with words, only force!"

The wisdom of Mr. Harold Rosenthal has been set forth truthfully and accurately. The question now to you is, WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PROTECT THE NATION AND EVERY CITIZEN FROM THE ABOVE POTENTIALS????
Those of us who have been in this battle to save our once great nation for so many years possibly become calloused, not too sensitive to the horrible things going on around us. I must admit however, that the FACTS as conveyed by Harold Wallace Rosenthal have made their impact on this writer.
The interview, or perhaps a better word might be confession, has helped to bring to the surface a reality of what we veterans have known for years, but the stark reality of Jewish treachery becomes more shocking when getting it ALL in one package.
Mr. Rosenthal, a former influential Jew in his own right, prided himself in being a vital part of the admitted control of the media, and of their invisible government in which no political power is exercised without Jewish approval. Let us also highlight the other key remarks of Mr. Rosenthal:

- That the American people have no guts and the Jews sneer at their stupidity.
- The Jews' power through their money and the money power afford them a "master plan" for international conquest through propaganda.
- There is in America an "unthinking majority."
- The Jews' treachery of pitting labor against management.
- The Jewish belief that Christ was just another man on the earth.
- That Jews are admitted parasites who have gained control of our society, government and economies through their religion.
- The myth of the Jews being the "chosen people."
- The confessed "big lie" that the Jews are a religion and not a nation.
- That the Jews fear being discovered for what they are.

We are beginning to uncover the whole conspiracy on the part of the Communists and World Zionism to capture control of our nation, and the Jews and their prostituted media are beginning to admit, as Mr. Rosenthal said, that we have them on the run, Believe us, dear reader, it will be a shock to the Jewish world when this gets into circulation and they discover we have our hands on this 'first hand' information from a Jew who was formerly respected in high government office, and it is this Report that could 'trip the miracle."
If, with your help, we can get this material distributed in the hands of citizens and even in government offices throughout the country, it might help bring about the desired 'action.'
As you have observed, the Jew conspiracy is to reduce our population to a subservient obedience designed to groom us for a Jew-controlled, international, money-changing dictatorship designed by Jewish-Zionists and Communists.
This is occurring and will continue if the American public allows itself to be so subdued. These One World subversives who have been running our bureaucracy in Washington have permitted over 12,000,000 aliens to come into this country illegally from all the nations of the world including China and Mexico and all nations in between. They are holding jobs which amount to more than the number of people we have unemployed.
This manuscript can act as a weapon with which we will open the eyes of the masses. They know something is wrong but they do not know what to do. NOW we can show them. Only by knowing the truth of the problems can a proper course of action be made.
Thus the importance of circulating this evidence to tens of thousands is necessary so a victory could be within our grasp. Although it is a lengthy manuscript, its contents will hold the attention of almost any reader. Why? Because it affects every man, woman and child in America. Yes, even throughout the world. IT IS THAT IMPORTANT! There cannot ever be another document of such vital importance.
This has to do with life and death facts. The revelations in this document are shocking and unbelievable to the innocent who can scarcely imagine such self-confessed evil ambitions. Mr. Rosenthal appeared to take great pride in being able to disclose some of their inner, untold secrets -- all of which unfolds as we listen to every word spoken (mine and his) during the lengthy interview (Walter White's interview with Harold Rosenthal) which is recorded on cassette tapes as our documentation.
The Jewish nation is the enemy of ALL nations. They have already become hysterical since this document was brought to their attention.
God save us! And that appeal to God is not an idle gesture. My Christian faith remains intact. "God save our nation," even if at present we are prisoners of a propaganda monopoly by a handful of subversives and manipulators. We can, with His help, lift the yoke and break the bonds so that our majority by righteous representation, can assert itself in following the freedom under our United States Constitution.
Warning
There is a risk involved in printing this manuscript. This writer was struck down on March 13, 1978 and badly beaten. But I risked my life before and I shall gladly do it again if only to get this knowledge into the hands of a few million people.
The reward that comes to those who stand by the Truth, regardless of the cost, is akin to what our Lord must have experienced when He resisted the devil. After the devil went away, the Scripture says, "Angels came and ministered unto Him."
We are in the final battle. We must do everything possible to "Pass the Word"... including prayer. (God has a plan for a nation to follow to free it from alien captivity -- "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble my, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." 2 Chr. 7:14, also Deut. 30:1-4, I Kings 8:33-34.)
At the time of my interview with Mr. Rosenthal, I knew it was very potent and I had an overwhelming confidence in its content to arouse and awaken many who formerly disbelieved. It is interesting how the Rosenthal document confirms the theme of the "Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion ." It might be called "Personalized Protocols -- 1979 Edition."
Anyone who does not know that the organized Jew is the instigator of World Communism, of International Zionism, and is in a conspiracy to destroy Christian civilization, is too naive and too ignorant to deal with the problems we face.
The Christ-hating Jew who conspires against our Christian Heritage, enjoys nothing better than the conservative who protects the Jew and will talk about everything dangerous to our country except the Hidden Hand of the Jew conspirators, the root of all evil which threatens Christian civilization. (While it is "the love of money" which "is the root of all evil" (I Tim. 6:10), the Jew exhibits far above other peoples, a love of money; and have an instinctive and compelling desire for attaining as much wealth as possible regardless of the means or harm it may cause.)
This evil force is the "ANTI-CHRIST," as revealed in the second letter of John, who says: "He is the Anti-Christ, that denies the Father and the Son." These Jew-protecting conservative and liberal Americans are knowingly or unknowingly helping to destroy their own country.
As a result -- JEWS RULE AMERICA -- THEY PLOT TO RULE THE WORLD -- WE ARE IN BONDAGE -- CAN WE ESCAPE? -- YES, BUT ONLY, if the Jew-protecting conservatives and liberals, who are helping the ANTI-CHRIST ZIONIST to DIVIDE AND CONQUER will learn and accept the TRUTH and be guided by the warnings of OUR SAVIOUR (John 8:44, and Matt. 23:12, etc.), and never think that they know better than He, -- and if they will UNITE with REAL Americans who know the TRUTH, in a battle to save our Country, we can escape from the clutches of CHRIST'S WORST ENEMIES -- THE ANTI-CHRIST JEWS, for this is ONE of several ways in which our Country can be saved.

________________________________________






The Hidden Tyranny
Part Two


"Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer."
The above is an exact quote of Harold Wallace Rosenthal, former top Administrative Aide to the then Senator Jacob Javits, who was since defeated in the 1980 election.
I, Walter White, Jr., for the past 17 years Director and Editor of the monthly conservative publication WESTERN FRONT, was told about Mr. Rosenthal's boastings around Washington, D.C., and I was encouraged to meet with him and to interview him (for a fee).
Mr. Rosenthal had stated publicly that the Jews will completely dominate throughout the entire world -- and that they control every facet of political life in America and every aspect of the communication media. (Mr. R's emphasis).
Eventually Mr. Rosenthal and l were brought together, at which time I interviewed him privately and taped said interview with Mr. Rosenthal's knowledge and consent. During the lengthy meeting Mr. Rosenthal became impatient, rude and vulgar (all of which is recorded on the tape) and he sought the balance of his fee before I had concluded my questioning.
Since the entire interview was so lengthy, in 1977 we released and published only the first portion under the same title as above "THE HIDDEN TYRANNY." Copies of this manuscript (Part I) have been sought by people from all around the globe. We now release the balance of the taped interview as Part Two.
Although I do not wish to digress, an Eastern analyst has told me that "The Hidden Tyranny" manuscript (Part I) has had a pass-on readership of 3.5%. Thus, if true, the manuscript (Part I) has been read by more than 7 MILLION people. When this final portion (Part Two) begins circulating, its impact may be even greater. It depends upon you, the reader.
Before any agreement was reached between us, I had established with Mr. Rosenthal that he would answer an unlimited number of questions with complete honesty and to the best of his ability.
It was because of this understanding that I took issue with Mr. Rosenthal during the final stages of the interview and accused him of not being honest with me as it related to his response to my question: "Do you have knowledge of WHEN and WHY the story began about the Jews being God's chosen people?" That is when he said in part: "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer -- so I wasn't lying -- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive."
As this goes to press, we still seek a governmental body to investigate Harold Rosenthal's allegations. My dictionary conveys such allegations as "TREASON."
We now pick up after a dispute during which the tape recorder has been turned off. Obviously where the "W" appears, those are my words. Where the "R" appears, that indicates comment.
"W". Mr. Rosenthal, when true history is permitted to be published at large -- when the truth actually surfaces -- what do you expect the people of the world will do to you Jews'?
R. I thought we had concluded this interview.
W. I'm concerned -- and this question seems to require your answer.
R. We were all finished White, and now you start to pump me again. I've already given you the 'tables of stone' and yet you want more. Never mind -- you wouldn't understand anyway -- you Christians!!!
W. So now you damn me because I'm a Christian. I thought we had tried to keep this on a business-like basis did we not?
R. (Mumbled exclamation by Rosenthal!!)
W. Whatever that is -- or means, you're using words I've never heard before. Are you speaking English?
R. I said -------.
W. Will you spell it?
R. (Rosenthal spells M-I-S-C-H-N-A-H and briefly says it is from the basics of the Talmud). Mr. R. continues: Let's not dwell on this. We're not getting anywhere -- besides we had concluded things and that ends our agreement.
W. Are you afraid to answer the question I posed?
R. Who the hell do you think I am -- I'm not afraid to answer any question but I've given you enough information for a book.
W. Did I not pay you as per our agreement?
R. Yeah -- sure -- but again you're wanting more. All right, you want my opinion as to what the people of the world are going to think when history is written.
W. Well, I didn't pose the question exactly like that, but go ahead.
R. I don't give a damn what the people will think. Besides, whenever that happens you and I will be dead. Plain dead. Does that satisfy you?
W. There are two or three questions among my notes here Mr. Rosenthal which have yet to be answered and one is quite important.
R. What is that?
W. The story about the six million Jews supposedly cremated or murdered by the Nazis.
R. What about it?
W. Do you know who or what Jewish organization created that big lie?
R. No, I don't know anything about its authenticity. I don't think it's too important anyway.
W. Mr. Rosenthal, you know better than that, What about the younger generation who is growing up believing this big lie? And you say it's not important!!
R. It was an outgrowth of the war and we all know that Hitler hated the Jews so someone, somewhere, thought of exaggerating the number. We know that many, many Jews were killed by the Nazis.
W. I'm sure you know that when World War II broke out there were less than a quarter of a million Jews in ALL of Germany. Many thousands had already left Germany.
R. So what? As I said before, the Jewish people are the cleverest people in the world. So somebody thought up a big number and perhaps it grew until now the number of Jews killed is six million. We have control of the news media and that is the great difference. Otherwise your people could tell YOUR big lie.
W. So you brush it off that lightly. Something of such enormity...
Mr. R. interrupted here saying -- My people have been taught to give consideration and attention to our teachers rather than to the words of your people and laws.
W. You're living in America, Mr. Rosenthal, It is our duty to uphold the laws of our Country. Your religion teaches you that you may take an oath such as when being inducted into political office -- and if the oath displeases you, you can deny silently the fact you have taken that oath.
Now I have copies of the Jewish document -- called the Kol Nidre and I have proven their authenticity. (The Kol Nidre ("all vows") is found in the Talmud book Nedarim (Vows), and is recited each year in the synagogue on the Day of Atonement It allows all future obligations. oaths or pledges a Jew may engage in to "be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect." This allows Jews to lie, subvert, cheat, etc.
R. Well -- all Jews don't practice that oath business, I'm sure.
W. But they do practice it, do they not -- with the Rabbi's approval.
R. To some extent. Perhaps when it is helpful to the individual.
W. Is that not sinful?
R. Maybe to your way of thinking. I've told you -- you and I are different. We are different people. Our beliefs are entirely different. We have been raised that way for many centuries so it is not a sin for us to take any oath and break it. It's our teaching. (This point on the difference of character has been made by many other Jewish writers and statesmen, and is well supported in history and science. Yet, ironically, Christians continue to believe the Jewish lie that "we are all the same" or "equal.")
W. I've possibly saved the most important question of all until now.
R. Listen, White, if you're going on any further, my time is money. We made an agreement and you're extending it beyond reason. You have it all on tapes and remember that we agreed for you to take whatever you want from the tapes and your notes -- but no reproduction of the tapes under any circumstances. They are to be destroyed. If you violate this White, we'll cut your balls off.
W. Who are WE?
R. Just get smart and you'll find out. You don't want any trouble and I don't either. You keep our agreement and no one gets hurt!! Now give me the rest of my money. Okay?
W. I intend to keep our agreement to the letter and you have my word of honor that these tapes will not go any further than my use in the preparation of the story. There is no misunderstanding. We agree on that and I'll keep my word. You'll get your money in a minute.
R. I have friends White -- I know a lot of people and I don't want them to be reading things attributed to me that I didn't say. I don't give a damn what you or anybody else thinks -- but I don't want lies printed -- only the questions and answers of this interview.
W. We understand each other perfectly in that regard, Mr. Rosenthal. Now, please, this question!!
R. Shoot. But remember I need Las Vegas money.
W. Surely you must know somewhere in your schooling, or you have some kind of personal feeling or understanding as to WHEN and WHY the story began that the Jews are God's Chosen People.
R. We ARE God's chosen people.
W. Do you really believe that Mr. Rosenthal?
R. Maybe I can explain or perhaps Jake could give you a better answer...
W. Who is Jake?
R. Jake Javits -- you know, my associate. He's the man that I work for and he's a pretty smart guy. Plenty smart. His answer might serve your purpose for the story better.
W. I want your answer!
R. . . . You and we actually have a different God.
W. Is that the answer to the Jews being God's chosen people?
R. To our god we are chosen ones. We are taught that from our childhood.
W. That is an evasive answer. You know what I mean when I pose such a question and I don't believe your reply or your explanation.
R. Okay. I don't give a damn what you believe.
W. Do your people believe that Jesus Christ was a Jew?
R. Hell! We're not going back to that again are we? We've already gone over that.
W. That was before the tape machine was ever turned on. I don't think we recorded your reply to this question.
R. Well, I can't answer for all Jews. I guess you're asking what Jews throughout the world believe?
Yes.
R. Jake could answer that better than I.
W. Please, I don't want Senator Javits' answer to anything. I want your answer.
R. White, I know what you're searching for. I've known from the beginning but that's all right. You and we are so apart. You're another breed. You're not our kind. It's not secret that we do not respect you, and of your kind. (Genesis 3:15).
W. Are you referring to just our kind as 'Christians'?
R. No, you gentiles -- all of you are our enemies. When I was a little boy, just a kid, very young, we were taught very wisely. Many centuries ago when the Jews were persecuted in almost every country and driven out of so many countries -- some of the governments, I cannot remember exactly whether it was the government of France or Spain. Anyway, the government demanded that the Jews must become Christians or be expelled from the country.
W. Yes, I recall reading of this many times.
R. Was it France or Spain.
W. Possibly both but I vividly remember the story of Queen Isabella of Spain -- how patient she was with the Jews -- always giving them the benefit of doubt -- until such time as her eyes were opened completely to the deceptions of the Jews. But please go on.
R. Anyway, the Jews at that time had a very wise Rabbi leader, a world leader, and his advice was respected throughout the world. He said that the Jews must pretend to become Christians and bide their time and make real sacrifices if necessary.
We have always been ready to sacrifice a few thousand Jews in exchange for world leadership. (This was the plan of the Jews who instigated WW II. Some Jews were sacrificed so that the "persecution" propaganda could continue.) It is a small price and there is nothing wrong with that.
I was taught that we Jews must become lawyers so we could control and strangle the courts, and even the judges, unless they were Jews. We should become doctors and teachers and leaders in all the churches -- and this goal has almost been fully accomplished.
I said it before and I'll say it now -- that we will have complete, I say complete control, throughout the entire world possibly before I die. We are very successful in keeping you gentiles confused. We create confusion. (The word Babylon in Hebrew is Babel and means confusion. The Jews are masters at confusion because they are the ringleaders of the system known as "Mystery Babylon.")
You're not stupid White. You know that the Jews are successful because of our unity. We die for one another if necessary. We generously finance our own, so it is understandable how we govern not only in this country. We direct American foreign affairs. We are the super government of the world. Is that enough?
W. Go on. I find what you are saying most interesting. Please go on.
R. We are the most powerful international body of people in the world! Do you believe that?
W. You speak with such confidence that I . . .
Mr. R. interrupted -- We can destroy any country's economy without their even being aware of it -- if we want to. I think this is what you want to hear. (Most Americans are totally unaware that by the Federal Reserve system their money has been stolen and the economy debauched.)
W. I'm expecting you to be truthful with me Mr. Rosenthal.
R. Well, it's true. We're smart -- we are powerful and at the proper time we will mix up your gentile women with the Blacks and in 50 years you'll be all mixed up. Niggers love to s---w your white women and we encourage it by using them to our advantage.
W. I recall your saying that the Blacks serve a purpose.
R. Yes, we will use them to a great advantage. (It was primarily by Jewish merchant ships and Jewish-run slave auctions that the blacks got to America.)
W. And try to destroy them after you have used them I presume?
R. If necessary. Yes! You and I know they're inferior people, a dumb race, but can be useful with the use of money. I mean real big money. Niggers will do anything for money. So, when the time comes -- and you might even live to see it -- we will have that complete control while you stupid Christians are waiting for your Christ, the impostor, to return as your savior.
W. You sound bitter.
R. Not at all. Why should I be bitter? We are on top!!
W. And when this whole sordid story becomes known, the result will be an aroused citizenry -- an angry citizenry who will want to destroy you.
R. How? I ask you how? YOU can't reach the people. We have it all under such control that no one -- no one or no-body can reach people unless it is done through our media control.
(Who has had control of the mass media in the 20th century?
-- Chairman of ABC Leonard Goldenson, President of CBS
-- James H. Rosenfield, Chairman of RCS
-- David Sarnoff, Chief Executive of NBC
-- Fred Silverman, President of PBS
-- Lawrence Grossman, Chairman of Time
-- Arthur Heiskell, Editor of U.S. News & World Report
-- Marvin Stone, Chief Executive of Dow Jones
-- Warren H. Phillips, Editor of Newsweek
-- Lester Bernstein, President of TV Guide
-- Walter Annenberg, President of New York Times
-- Sulzberger family, TV program producer
-- Norman Lear
-- these and more all are Jews!!)
We have it sewed up!! We have infected your churches completely and we now control the school system in the United States. It is a reality that we have complete control of organized Christianity. Almost anywhere -- completely.
W. I find so many things you say to be repulsive. The way you say things . . .
R. It's what you wanted to hear or you wouldn't have paid good money for this interview.
W. So long as you are truthful with me -- but you still haven't answered that question I posed long back -- do you believe that Jesus Christ was a Jew?
R. As I said, Jake could give you a really intelligent answer. I know that most of our friends, kids and people I grew up with -- in fact all of our friends -- I'd say all of them, don't believe Christ was a Jew. He was an impostor and millions of people all over the world now believe that Christianity was founded on untruth and deliberate incorrect translations of your Bible.
Christ was a fraud. Even the National Council of Churches agree that there were false translations of the book your people respect. It's built on lies. [This comment can hardly be regarded as coming from a true Christian source since the National Council of Churches was organized by Jews and its theology is controlled by them.]
W. According to the latest scholarly research, your ancestors are not Israelites but Mongolians and Asiatics from Eastern Europe and Western Asia, so your ancestors were thousands of miles from the Holy Land. They never, ever saw the Holy Land -- proving that your people were not the chosen people of God.
R. So what? What difference does it make?
W. We have been taught the big lie for many years that Jews are God's Chosen people, so it does make a difference. A very grave difference.
R. What grave difference?
W. Does it not prove that the great majority of Jews today are Khazar in origin. Your ancestors never trod the lands where Christ walked. They never knew Jerusalem and Palestine so how could . . . (Mr. R. interrupted)
R. (shouting) What the hell difference does it make now?
W. I find so many things that you have said as being repulsive and your arrogant manner in boasting, as it were, to admittedly being a part of this gigantic . . . this heinous plot against mankind -- and at times, you attempt to brush things off by saying 'what difference does it make'. So much of what you have admitted staggers me, in fact, I lack the words . . . (Mr. R. interrupts here).
R. That's because you're a gentile. You don't understand. You never will! Until it's too late and my hope, personally, is that the American people do not... (Mr. R. paused here).
W. There is so much of what you have said, that as an individual, people may not believe you -- they may not believe this interview...(Mr. R. interrupts).
R. That is why we have the control today. One of the reasons. Your people did not believe that it was possible for any people or race to accomplish what we have within a couple of hundred years.
The gentile is stupid. WE are intelligent. I am going to be a very important person in and around Washington and soon. I intend to become nationally prominent. You are going to hear and read about me in the future. I'm young and have had the guts to tell you more than any other Jew would ever dare to tell you -- at least publicly. I've stuck my neck out White. Some of what I have told you is part of the inner, invisible world of Jewry.
W. Looking at you now as I denote your change, I see you as a despicable bastard -- all of you . . . (Mr. R. interrupts).
R. No one calls me a bastard and gets away with it!!
W. You are all contemptible, base and detestable ---
R. I'll knock your God damn head off if you call me a bastard . . .
W. I wouldn't try it if I were you. I too have friends, many of them would like a chance to get to you so let's keep this on a formal basis as it was intended at the beginning. (Mr. R. then said something which I asked him to spell. He spelled O-Y V-A-Y, Oy Vay, and added oy vay iz mir, and when asked what it meant he said I would not understand, but I am including it here because it is on the tape.)
W. Many times when referring to a person being a Jew, I have heard it said, 'Well, I understand he is a Presbyterian or a Catholic.' So, I would like your opinion or explanation. How do Jews feel about another Jew who becomes a Christian Scientist or converts to any other religion? Is he or she no longer a Jew?
R. That can best be answered -- well let me put it this way. I don't know what your mother and father were -- what nationality I mean . . .
W. My father was British -- English, and my mother was German.
R. Well, if you decided to study Zionism or the Talmud or actually wanted to become converted and attended the synagogue would that erase your English or German heritage?
W. Of course not -- but I wanted to hear it from a learned Jew. What you have said then is that he or she is always a Jew.
R. It's stupid -- stupid. We are what we are! No matter what we join or adopt it doesn't change what we ARE. I am a Jew and nothing can change me because I take up another religion. Such stupidity!
W. But the Jews are a great part of this deceit.
R. We have a talent for confusing your issues.
W. You are masters of deceit and this cunning practice of yours has allowed your people to infiltrate the governments throughout the world.
R. Why not? Why shouldn't we take over the banks, the universities, the church and the government if the gentiles are not intelligent enough to run them? I could not have talked this way a few years ago but now it is different. There is nothing to undo our strategy in the world today so I can speak much more freely. What I've disclosed may help other Jews to speak out if they have any guts. We are not a pusillanimous race.
W. You're very sure of yourself and your people aren't you?
R. We may be divided in many things, but nothing ever actually separates us.
W. Who is WE?
R. My people, the Jews are 'as one' when it counts most. No incident can ever divide us.
(Down throughout the centuries Jews have learned they cannot trust other people. Thus, the Jewish racial bond is their greatest bond.)
W. I have heard Jews fight each other with venom!
R. Ahh, that's entirely different. Sure we will fight one another but as I say, when it counts most we're 'as one'. Our forte, White, is division and duplicity. It is an infallible weapon and we are skillful -- perhaps perfectionists in its application. You don't have the intelligence to compete.
W. But we have a culture that you Jews will never understand or equal.
R. Jews have a family life. Our culture requires a high standard in education. We establish standards so that our kids exceed that of their parents. Our people continue to show a dramatic educational advancement. Our kids' success doesn't depend entirely on schools but on the family and we are damn proud of these accomplishments.
You can't compete! More than 12,000 doctors are graduated from medical schools in the United States every year and almost 10,000 of them are Jews. Among the law students the Jewish percentage is even higher. Jews are on such a solid foundation here in the United States that any kind of opposition to our control would only be temporary.
You know we laugh about the, six million story just like the story that Christ was a Jew and the God's Chosen People story. This should show people that we have a solidarity like none other in the world. Jews have a closeness to other Jews whom they have never seen or perhaps even heard of.
W. Mr. Rosenthal, I hope you haven't lied to me in any of this interview because if you did we could retaliate on you. Understand?
R. What I have told you is true -- ALL of it. I don't need to lie.
W. I have found the Jews' passion is greed, profit and the destruction of Christianity. Am I correct?
R. I cannot speak for all Jews.
W. I'm speaking of the great majority of Jews. Am I right?
R. Maybe most Jews feel that way -- but there's nothing wrong with that!!
W. I think you just go on and on because there is a bitterness within you and perhaps you say things that even you do not believe. Some of the things you say are almost unbelievable.
R. Well I don't give a good God damn what you believe. I've given you honest answers and opinions. Now no more questions. And don't forget our agreement -- if I learn that the tapes are used other than what we agreed upon you will suffer serious consequences. Do you understand?
W. I understand. And now Mr. Rosenthal, here is the balance of the money agreed upon for this interview.
-- FINIS --
Dear reader -- after the tape machine had been turned off, I accused Harold Rosenthal of not living up to our agreement in replying truthfully to my question as to the Jews being God's Chosen people. He replied:
"We are god's chosen people . . . Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer -- so I wasn't lying -- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive."
I was stunned. I had no further comment. I had watched this arrogant, boastful person change at times like a chameleon that changes its color. Many times he showed a hatred -- yes, even a venom. At the conclusion I felt unclean being around him.